IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ecrit] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy-04.txt

"FORTE, ANDREA G" <forte@att.com> Fri, 30 May 2014 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <forte@att.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70FD1A0A6F for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id duhHTq4IgfPq for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D27291A03A0 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.1-0) with ESMTP id 303e8835.2b5f174a4940.5993672.00-2447.16711813.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <forte@att.com>); Fri, 30 May 2014 19:58:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5388e303465d3fb4-483ae343dbafd9554f1c5a51129a5be74cc2d124
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.1-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id ef2e8835.0.5993593.00-2351.16711570.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <forte@att.com>); Fri, 30 May 2014 19:58:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5388e2ff37fbbdbb-2d594f80931f72472670f028ffa276c4d4589b9a
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4UJwrGY031853; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:58:54 -0400
Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4UJweI9031570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 May 2014 15:58:44 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAH.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAH.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.152]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 30 May 2014 19:58:28 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.2.124]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAH.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.152]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:58:28 -0400
From: "FORTE, ANDREA G" <forte@att.com>
To: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPfDpWmvJRlkTNl02SUMlQPfuJhZtZipaA
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:58:27 +0000
Message-ID: <CFAE583E.7AEF%forte@att.com>
References: <20140530190648.27325.52041.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140530190648.27325.52041.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.1.140326
x-originating-ip: [135.210.227.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <011233808E384443B42ABDFD06AE376F@LOCAL>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=DOA4FVxb c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=fS4xg2TqOVMA:10 a=0sAT2sIeamgA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=PZe]
X-AnalysisOut: [FKg0xOyoA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zQP7CpK]
X-AnalysisOut: [OAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=QH5x2ri6zyo86PsRxgcA:9 a=CjuIK1]
X-AnalysisOut: [q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <forte@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/Q6UWkE1lqc5MSIhsoJbEdYmOjyk
Subject: [Ecrit] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:59:05 -0000

Hi all,

I have just submitted revision 04 of the draft. There are still three open
issues regarding this draft that I would like the WG to discuss. There is
a corresponding "NOTE" paragraph

in the draft for each one of those.

1. Have we agreed to allow private namespaces such as urn:nena in this
document? If so, please take a look at Section 3 of the draft and let me
know if the writing is sufficient.
2. If we allow private namespaces, should Section 4 apply only to the
public namespace domain or do we still want to provide some general
guidelines for private namespaces as well?
3. When we last discussed this document, there were suggestions on
allowing external non-IETF documents/templates to be submitted to the
expert for review. Should we have some requirements about this document in
Section 5? Any specific suggestions on the direction to follow?

Regarding #2, my inclination would be to limit the guidelines only to
public namespaces. For private namespaces, perhaps, the expert reviewer
would just make sure that there are no conflicts with registered public
namespaces.

Thanks,
-Andrea




On 5/30/14, 3:06 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
wrote:

>
>A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy-04.txt
>has been successfully submitted by Andrea G. Forte and posted to the
>IETF repository.
>
>Name:		draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy
>Revision:	04
>Title:		Policy for defining new service-identifying labels
>Document date:	2014-05-30
>Group:		ecrit
>Pages:		4
>URL:            
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy-04
>.txt
>Status:         
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy/
>Htmlized:       
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy-04
>Diff:           
>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-policy-04
>
>Abstract:
>   In order to provide location-based services, descriptive terms for
>   services need to be defined.  This document updates the policy for
>   defining new service-identifying labels.
>
>                  
>        
>
>
>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>submission
>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>The IETF Secretariat
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email