[Ecrit] Adding top-level service labels

"Andrea G. Forte" <forte@att.com> Mon, 19 December 2011 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <forte@att.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DA511E8098 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:15:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezqbNCnxPRiT for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail119.messagelabs.com (mail119.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD6611E8080 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:15:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Env-Sender: forte@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-119.messagelabs.com!1324329308!6591006!1
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-StarScan-Version: 6.4.3; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 22003 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2011 21:15:09 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-4.tower-119.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Dec 2011 21:15:09 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBJLFbMP031472 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:15:37 -0500
Received: from sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (sflint02.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.229]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBJLFV2g031387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:15:32 -0500
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:14:51 -0500
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJLEpKH004119 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:14:51 -0500
Received: from [151.109.8.213] (dn151-109-8-213.dhcpn.ugn.att.com [151.109.8.213]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJLEblG003710 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:14:49 -0500
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:16:14 -0500
From: "Andrea G. Forte" <forte@att.com>
To: "ecrit@ietf.org Org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CB1513CE.9A50%forte@att.com>
Thread-Topic: Adding top-level service labels
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-RSA-Action: allow
Subject: [Ecrit] Adding top-level service labels
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:15:11 -0000

Dear all,

Recently, the LoST Extensions draft has been ratified as RFC 6451. This
means that people can start using LoST for non-emergency services.
Furthermore, Telecom Italia (the first Italian mobile carrier) has
contacted us for knowing the status of the service classification draft as
they were interested in working in that area.

We think that times have matured enough to resume our discussion on
non-emergency location-based services. However, given that this is the
ECRIT working group, I wanted to bring to the group's attention the draft
on service URN update policy
[http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy-00].

As a reminder, this draft would update "Section 4.1 of [RFC5031] in that
the policy for adding top-level service labels is "Expert Review".  The
expert is designated by the RAI Area Director". Today standard action is
required for this, which is a significant overkill to just add "food" or
"lodging". I do not see any harm in introducing this change in policy but
I would like to know the opinion of the WG.

Thanks,
-- Andrea G. Forte