Re: [Ecrit] Adding top-level service labels

Dear WG,

There has been little response to this proposal from Andrea.  In discussions with the ADs, the chairs have concluded that if this document progresses, it will have to be through the working group.  So we would like to issue a consensus call for whether the WG should take this document on as a WG item.  

Please send comments to the list no later than 21 Feb 2012.

Thanks,
Richard and Marc

On Dec 19, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Andrea G. Forte wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Recently, the LoST Extensions draft has been ratified as RFC 6451. This
> means that people can start using LoST for non-emergency services.
> Furthermore, Telecom Italia (the first Italian mobile carrier) has
> contacted us for knowing the status of the service classification draft as
> they were interested in working in that area.
> 
> We think that times have matured enough to resume our discussion on
> non-emergency location-based services. However, given that this is the
> ECRIT working group, I wanted to bring to the group's attention the draft
> on service URN update policy
> [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy-00].
> 
> As a reminder, this draft would update "Section 4.1 of [RFC5031] in that
> the policy for adding top-level service labels is "Expert Review".  The
> expert is designated by the RAI Area Director". Today standard action is
> required for this, which is a significant overkill to just add "food" or
> "lodging". I do not see any harm in introducing this change in policy but
> I would like to know the opinion of the WG.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- Andrea G. Forte
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit