IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Edm] [Ext] EDM program meeting at IETF 114

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 13 July 2022 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEFEC157B5A for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaJugxBtP2zw for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa2.lax.icann.org (ppa2.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9338DC157B36 for <edm@iab.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa2.lax.icann.org (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 26DH6H4k022333 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:06:17 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:06:16 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0986.026; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:06:16 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
CC: "edm@iab.org" <edm@iab.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Edm] EDM program meeting at IETF 114
Thread-Index: AQHYltrdTm4B9J9MCkS6ahu8CDz8Kw==
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:06:16 +0000
Message-ID: <2705888B-AE07-4C49-BF2B-96BE018A075C@icann.org>
References: <5A0D0A61-CDE1-452B-A023-4605E84C3D60@apple.com> <56bad529-ae4d-5390-72e7-352f19b53048@nostrum.com> <980b843c-c6bc-f821-ddcf-499458a141f5@nostrum.com> <1416D865-FA91-4E11-BFFE-5EDD6B85904C@apple.com> <00AC959C-26DF-48C8-8CD2-4E95F67A9A7C@amsl.com> <13FB1B22-D59E-425C-9EBA-010F90088179@kuehlewind.net> <09a1e7a5-9578-05a5-1fc1-9486e2eecdf3@nostrum.com> <3C980B34-2D02-4ED8-805B-11CDA6672DFD@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <3C980B34-2D02-4ED8-805B-11CDA6672DFD@kuehlewind.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_70B72DF3-434E-4309-AA0F-781B43619841"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-07-13_07,2022-07-13_03,2022-06-22_01
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/3LfeeK3Q9L-d7t6DCGBGncor87M>
Subject: Re: [Edm] [Ext] EDM program meeting at IETF 114
X-BeenThere: edm@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Evolvability, Deployability, & Maintainability \(Proposed\) Program" <edm.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edm/>
List-Post: <mailto:edm@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:06:20 -0000

On Jul 13, 2022, at 10:01 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> 
> I was asking this question because I wasn’t sure if it should/need to be on the main agenda. But as I said we definitely want to session in the datatracker and also respectively an announcement to be sent (as we do with interims).
> 
> What are the pros/cons to have on the main agenda?
> 
> I guess announcing is widely is good, however, on the other hand I think we still aim for a not too large group of people to have an interactive discussion. Also I think we should not overload the lunch slots of the agenda with things that then suddenly appear more formal then they might be… so tending to not put it on the main agenda but don’t have a strong opinion. Or do we need to bring this to attention of the whole IAB?
> 
> Mirja
> 
> P.S.: Tommy is on holidays till end of the week. But David might have an opinion…?

When Tommy started this thread, he said that the meeting was "booked for 9-10am (Philadelphia time) on Thursday, July 28, in the IAB room (Independence D - Mezzanine)". I would hope that is still possible for something on the "main agenda"; I've already slotted it out in my own agenda.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email