IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Edm] [Ext] EDM program meeting at IETF 114

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 13 July 2022 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1EAC15A728 for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NsCwY2idAbCE for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE10C1388D1 for <edm@iab.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dslb-084-056-074-061.084.056.pools.vodafone-ip.de ([84.56.74.61] helo=smtpclient.apple); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1oBfs2-00045I-MF; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:09:54 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <2705888B-AE07-4C49-BF2B-96BE018A075C@icann.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:09:53 +0200
Cc: "edm@iab.org" <edm@iab.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <274189E0-19B9-4F9B-BAAE-5FD7A5FAE966@kuehlewind.net>
References: <5A0D0A61-CDE1-452B-A023-4605E84C3D60@apple.com> <56bad529-ae4d-5390-72e7-352f19b53048@nostrum.com> <980b843c-c6bc-f821-ddcf-499458a141f5@nostrum.com> <1416D865-FA91-4E11-BFFE-5EDD6B85904C@apple.com> <00AC959C-26DF-48C8-8CD2-4E95F67A9A7C@amsl.com> <13FB1B22-D59E-425C-9EBA-010F90088179@kuehlewind.net> <09a1e7a5-9578-05a5-1fc1-9486e2eecdf3@nostrum.com> <3C980B34-2D02-4ED8-805B-11CDA6672DFD@kuehlewind.net> <2705888B-AE07-4C49-BF2B-96BE018A075C@icann.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1657732196;d9ff7e34;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1oBfs2-00045I-MF
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/fJtyUPGbPTJHp-vjEgxu8Bezm4I>
Subject: Re: [Edm] [Ext] EDM program meeting at IETF 114
X-BeenThere: edm@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Evolvability, Deployability, & Maintainability \(Proposed\) Program" <edm.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edm/>
List-Post: <mailto:edm@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:10:01 -0000

We will definitely keep the announced slot.


> On 13. Jul 2022, at 19:06, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 13, 2022, at 10:01 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
>> 
>> I was asking this question because I wasn’t sure if it should/need to be on the main agenda. But as I said we definitely want to session in the datatracker and also respectively an announcement to be sent (as we do with interims).
>> 
>> What are the pros/cons to have on the main agenda?
>> 
>> I guess announcing is widely is good, however, on the other hand I think we still aim for a not too large group of people to have an interactive discussion. Also I think we should not overload the lunch slots of the agenda with things that then suddenly appear more formal then they might be… so tending to not put it on the main agenda but don’t have a strong opinion. Or do we need to bring this to attention of the whole IAB?
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>> P.S.: Tommy is on holidays till end of the week. But David might have an opinion…?
> 
> When Tommy started this thread, he said that the meeting was "booked for 9-10am (Philadelphia time) on Thursday, July 28, in the IAB room (Independence D - Mezzanine)". I would hope that is still possible for something on the "main agenda"; I've already slotted it out in my own agenda.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email