Re: [Edm] EDM program meeting at IETF 114

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 13 July 2022 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BBCC14CF1D for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YWYJa1Dl2rkJ for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B300C14CF16 for <edm@iab.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 26DGidJF062324 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:44:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1657730683; bh=Slzz7nFt9pv5Y5JO+Tmw9N/1ua2b0YFTe7EnkknxJBI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=rAX2ZX1AoJZGzTev1e9qDQFkJG75+/yKZTnuT+7nVjlhGvDgvaQCTEhYVVF+Lq7gJ KL/anev8W9OZIq1zKhQiHDHaeHRXWYJRO/OnWVCdS9t2x3R/ufui5yCsONXjASmLJJ oOvIGDHCIftHnT+1nSj+CiHEbQZ1mkF7F1Sjes2E=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Message-ID: <09a1e7a5-9578-05a5-1fc1-9486e2eecdf3@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:44:34 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Cindy Morgan <cmorgan@amsl.com>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, edm@iab.org
References: <5A0D0A61-CDE1-452B-A023-4605E84C3D60@apple.com> <56bad529-ae4d-5390-72e7-352f19b53048@nostrum.com> <980b843c-c6bc-f821-ddcf-499458a141f5@nostrum.com> <1416D865-FA91-4E11-BFFE-5EDD6B85904C@apple.com> <00AC959C-26DF-48C8-8CD2-4E95F67A9A7C@amsl.com> <13FB1B22-D59E-425C-9EBA-010F90088179@kuehlewind.net>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <13FB1B22-D59E-425C-9EBA-010F90088179@kuehlewind.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/a7vry1hcB9FjmajoZq6bUcf_-BY>
Subject: Re: [Edm] EDM program meeting at IETF 114
X-BeenThere: edm@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Evolvability, Deployability, & Maintainability \(Proposed\) Program" <edm.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edm/>
List-Post: <mailto:edm@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:44:50 -0000

On 7/13/22 11:42 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
> The EDM chairs should definitely put the session in the datatracker as this is also what we did for the interim meetings and it’s good to have the complete record there.
>
> Will that automatically mean that is will show up on the main agenda?
No - I think they will need the secretariat's help to make that happen 
correctly. Lets take that conversation off-list.
>
> Mirja
>
>   
>
>> On 11. Jul 2022, at 18:48, Cindy Morgan <cmorgan@amsl.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The IAB agreed to take Technical Programs public right as COVID started, so the precedent is mostly theoretical at this point, but it is there. For example, Model-T requested a slot in the regular agenda for 107, but since that meeting ended up being truncated to just BOFs and Area meetings, that session didn't actually happen.
>>
>> We can get this EDM session added to the main agenda, if that's what you would like, it would just appear as being in a slot by itself since it's before the regular sessions start.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cindy
>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2022, at 2:59 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>> I’m not aware of IAB program meetings other than the RFC Editor Model program showing up on the main agenda. We don’t have room for this as a regular session.
>>>
>>> Cindy, can you comment on the standard practice here?
>>>
>>> Tommy
>>>
>>>> On Jul 8, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> (Resending from a better address - admins please delete the one stuck in queue)
>>>>
>>>> On 7/8/22 1:32 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>>>> This isn't on the agenda. Please ask the secretariat if they can make it appear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Had you considered requesting it as a regular session?
>>>>>
>>>>> RjS
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/29/22 11:28 AM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
>>>>>> Hello EDM,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For IETF 114, we’re planning on having an in-person discussion for the EDM program!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently, this is booked for 9-10am (Philadelphia time) on Thursday, July 28, in the IAB room (Independence D - Mezzanine).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have agenda topics you’d like to suggest within the realm of Extensibility, Deployability, and Maintenance, please let us know!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some initial topics we’ll want to cover are:
>>>>>> - Community feedback on draft-iab-protocol-maintenance, and plan for publishing the document
>>>>>> - Status of implementation tracking and next steps
>>>>>> - Scrubbing of issues list: https://github.com/intarchboard/program-edm/issues
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Tommy & David
>> -- 
>> Edm mailing list
>> Edm@iab.org
>> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm