Re: [Edm] Scheduling virtual EDM program calls

Tommy, all: Any interest in the archiving implementations thread [1].
There appears to be a reasonably robust discussion on this topic.  There is
no specific document yet, but I could prepare one for the post IETF 109
meeting if we want to discuss this more.

Thanks,

- vijay

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/1AV0yGy5cetLjmP6aOu0xyD2kHE/

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:58 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello EDM,
>
> I’d like to schedule a call for December, after IETF 109, for this group
> to discuss next steps on progressing documents on extensibility,
> ossification, greasing, etc.
>
> I’ve set up a Doodle here to figure out which dates work best for people:
>
> https://doodle.com/poll/8zv4tanmqnk44tis?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
>
> For that meeting, I’d appreciate if people can review Martin’s
> use-it-or-lose-it draft, and file any issues that come up during your
> review.
>
> Document:
> https://intarchboard.github.io/use-it-or-lose-it/draft-iab-use-it-or-lose-it.html
> Issues: https://github.com/intarchboard/use-it-or-lose-it/issues
>
> I’d also like to hear from people about what cadence for virtual
> discussions they’d be interested in. At a minimum, I think we should have a
> call roughly once per main IETF meeting.
>
> Best,
> Tommy
> --
> Edm mailing list
> Edm@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm
>