Re: [Edm] Implementations (was Scheduling virtual EDM program calls)

Dear Tommy, that sounds good.  I will prepare an I-D and share when ready.
Thanks,
- vijay

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:45 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

> Hi Vijay,
>
> I’d like to keep this next call focused on the document and topics around
> greasing, etc. However, I do want to continue discussing and looking at the
> topic of implementation tracking more.
>
> If you could prepare a proposal draft as you suggest, and share it with
> this list, we can have list discussion and then a call around that topic
> later. Would that work?
>
> I think this also dovetails with the work I shared on the list about
> annotating implementation requirements and tracking implementation status
> for test results; perhaps that kind of documentation on an ongoing basis
> can help.
>
> Best,
> Tommy
>
> On Nov 15, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Tommy, all: Any interest in the archiving implementations thread [1].
> There appears to be a reasonably robust discussion on this topic.  There is
> no specific document yet, but I could prepare one for the post IETF 109
> meeting if we want to discuss this more.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - vijay
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/1AV0yGy5cetLjmP6aOu0xyD2kHE/
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:58 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
> 40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello EDM,
>>
>> I’d like to schedule a call for December, after IETF 109, for this group
>> to discuss next steps on progressing documents on extensibility,
>> ossification, greasing, etc.
>>
>> I’ve set up a Doodle here to figure out which dates work best for people:
>>
>> https://doodle.com/poll/8zv4tanmqnk44tis?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
>>
>> For that meeting, I’d appreciate if people can review Martin’s
>> use-it-or-lose-it draft, and file any issues that come up during your
>> review.
>>
>> Document:
>> https://intarchboard.github.io/use-it-or-lose-it/draft-iab-use-it-or-lose-it.html
>> Issues: https://github.com/intarchboard/use-it-or-lose-it/issues
>>
>> I’d also like to hear from people about what cadence for virtual
>> discussions they’d be interested in. At a minimum, I think we should have a
>> call roughly once per main IETF meeting.
>>
>> Best,
>> Tommy
>> --
>> Edm mailing list
>> Edm@iab.org
>> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm
>>
> --
> Edm mailing list
> Edm@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm
>
>
>