Re: [Edm] Implementations (was Scheduling virtual EDM program calls)

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Fri, 20 November 2020 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CB63A1175 for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bmY_OITOBMLQ for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com (nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com [17.151.62.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D603A115C for <edm@iab.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0AKKdnUt038313; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:06 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=20180706; bh=lkKraHZc77EQ6vhrkk/3+cXcbXL/qJSdpLzDac6rDQI=; b=v0+4B6u2uRNxazGxVHDuQlRyRCGOGqOk4iqnDXnf9gK4kS3lm7hvg5CeVtkvSw7DbkNn w1YGVl50v1OcgGwgf/wDXLYBaJd7rgTArIXsXsxyEcxElH91ZNNL82YVLD0LXXOqTIMf wiGpuDx2tRVF8RyelP1YReM7w/Y0m0pxrNdjudSASYpdXmRgWbLqf1wA3VQ/VbJly2S3 rEjPe53JWNDjAKZLjGrKfrzY8HHh/R+9ETEQtjEpdKq1Qck1vCTGuFeeO/7VU7j8RTxL IS0Yrxt13U+btU8PyArbGwgzj8l6V4hrV5IL4A5kI8QTW+x767duyHIUsawwEe815peN BQ==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.150]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com with ESMTP id 34tcpqwba0-3 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:06 -0800
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.14]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.6.20200729 64bit (built Jul 29 2020)) with ESMTPS id <0QK400EZE4B5UCR0@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.6.20200729 64bit (built Jul 29 2020)) id <0QK4003003K9ZX00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: d3d7d3c5f6e88e1efd50052fb8185312
X-Va-E-CD: a2d32b1f83817993666045d5ff4d1702
X-Va-R-CD: 184566a9e8468b0cc43b889dc6211498
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 63a62303-6dd7-4f0d-b500-cc29e777431d
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: d3d7d3c5f6e88e1efd50052fb8185312
X-V-E-CD: a2d32b1f83817993666045d5ff4d1702
X-V-R-CD: 184566a9e8468b0cc43b889dc6211498
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: 284a61a8-60ea-490f-9139-c19edfd03458
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-11-20_13:2020-11-20, 2020-11-20 signatures=0
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [17.235.39.161]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.6.20200729 64bit (built Jul 29 2020)) with ESMTPSA id <0QK400WA94B3KI00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-id: <FFD5BA6B-516A-43D7-9681-C9F97FCFB96E@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_04A3D5FF-2D92-4148-929D-DAE5F5875E7F"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\))
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:45:03 -0800
In-reply-to: <CAMMTW_K3zRMR7aX_PwH4DJu3RnBhAVFieikctdU_z6C1S43KCg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, edm@iab.org
To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
References: <C1A13445-5CFE-4659-8722-A7B17C170A78@apple.com> <CAMMTW_K3zRMR7aX_PwH4DJu3RnBhAVFieikctdU_z6C1S43KCg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-11-20_13:2020-11-20, 2020-11-20 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/qjCI54PLA8eGyXu-49wCUUxInjY>
Subject: Re: [Edm] Implementations (was Scheduling virtual EDM program calls)
X-BeenThere: edm@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Evolvability, Deployability, & Maintainability \(Proposed\) Program" <edm.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edm/>
List-Post: <mailto:edm@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:45:09 -0000

Hi Vijay,

I’d like to keep this next call focused on the document and topics around greasing, etc. However, I do want to continue discussing and looking at the topic of implementation tracking more.

If you could prepare a proposal draft as you suggest, and share it with this list, we can have list discussion and then a call around that topic later. Would that work?

I think this also dovetails with the work I shared on the list about annotating implementation requirements and tracking implementation status for test results; perhaps that kind of documentation on an ongoing basis can help.

Best,
Tommy 

> On Nov 15, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Tommy, all: Any interest in the archiving implementations thread [1].  There appears to be a reasonably robust discussion on this topic.  There is no specific document yet, but I could prepare one for the post IETF 109 meeting if we want to discuss this more.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> 
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/1AV0yGy5cetLjmP6aOu0xyD2kHE/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/1AV0yGy5cetLjmP6aOu0xyD2kHE/>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:58 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> Hello EDM,
> 
> I’d like to schedule a call for December, after IETF 109, for this group to discuss next steps on progressing documents on extensibility, ossification, greasing, etc.
> 
> I’ve set up a Doodle here to figure out which dates work best for people:
> 
> https://doodle.com/poll/8zv4tanmqnk44tis?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link <https://doodle.com/poll/8zv4tanmqnk44tis?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link>
> 
> For that meeting, I’d appreciate if people can review Martin’s use-it-or-lose-it draft, and file any issues that come up during your review.
> 
> Document: https://intarchboard.github.io/use-it-or-lose-it/draft-iab-use-it-or-lose-it.html <https://intarchboard.github.io/use-it-or-lose-it/draft-iab-use-it-or-lose-it.html>
> Issues: https://github.com/intarchboard/use-it-or-lose-it/issues <https://github.com/intarchboard/use-it-or-lose-it/issues>
> 
> I’d also like to hear from people about what cadence for virtual discussions they’d be interested in. At a minimum, I think we should have a call roughly once per main IETF meeting.
> 
> Best,
> Tommy
> -- 
> Edm mailing list
> Edm@iab.org <mailto:Edm@iab.org>
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm>
> -- 
> Edm mailing list
> Edm@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm