IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emailcore] Proposed ESMTP keyword RCPTLIMIT

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 12 March 2021 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0453A112E for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:22:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HnWOXFJFA5yE for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wforward5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wforward5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD673A1129 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailforward.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866311AED; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:22:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:22:04 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=wUgK7Nbjxr+g8fx6NwocaQqtVvTx0 3JDlWPXi34J8QY=; b=P9WHS+WTezwUvkP0nhmKKU8FvrFnADU5Oqa9ETmDdj4fc nrNuiciwY8J3WgFlpH64Is499XhyBEEcLDrCDs8gae3uX8x3uocojRRKzMZabgL1 QPd71E211Q2TMa/pDp7kmTXxg9P/zHi8+RpE/Z2UTtcYO3m8BGVOZZa15I2gLm+z WBuL+tmDQbAptN2Lsy+qf0yz3UL9w0R8fuJrdOKSFxuA4ef3Sx9eIupEvYPxosQ0 jeLFkeponAvrGUVqTSUB3ACJn58JFxiWyDuwPAAy61YkHlvgicYClz/zSilk1/YJ FFTZe8wwyqWbkehjGfclFc3lhPJPSz1d9VeGqrfUA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:aM1LYL8L2cl7DCKvkPIb6fZVFhJwCRjov_kB03ka9IaBco-2F2Yk7g> <xme:aM1LYHu2AbAYXWFWbjaldQwl61jA-CK4gDj_N6eRWQqvjA1iCGXeai0z-RMKTc_Kv xoOTnjzO00GLQWfaA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddvvddgudefhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpehruffvfhfhohfkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeff rghvvgcuvehrohgtkhgvrhcuoeguhhgtsegutghrohgtkhgvrhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepkedtleffgfdvieduhfdvhefhjedvvdduieekvdeufeeigfetheefgeef vefftedunecuffhomhgrihhnpegssghifidrnhgvthenucfkphepuddtkedrvddviedrud eivddrieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mhepughhtgesuggtrhhotghkvghrrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:aM1LYJCMcVVpULM-ZtzhVwdoFtlDJkhCBsDgzwUKGqSisWG-a2-KZw> <xmx:aM1LYHelRR_ayEIf-r5Jg-Ja9xSWKFW5s3xyf9VLqx7KvbjYFLo3DA> <xmx:aM1LYAMiSNsxOsYWXvK6U4pA0VPAZJcg6fnUPQkdsTX28VnVTyaT4w> <xmx:bM1LYJl0X_Xsh6Hin6HKYsPpNTo314ze6tYhzd7TgOECgW1o9OVND98RtbI>
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D080624005D; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:21:59 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: "Brotman, Alex" <Alex_Brotman@comcast.com>, "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Todd Herr <todd.herr=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "emailcore@ietf.org" <emailcore@ietf.org>, Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
References: <ca851fda-63ac-8739-c3eb-bde725aa25f3@isode.com> <c188413b-9337-40d8-8062-9c0f58f6cd98@www.fastmail.com> <CAHej_8kHwEOmq5bf49=Tt6ZEVkuidMhy5s4XPu7JC+k22qraZg@mail.gmail.com> <0F2370D0-D04C-45A1-A5A1-8FF1F174FFE5@dukhovni.org> <CAHej_8=deJU1CW2AzDBu5ji3Uir+_zF6Gp59Z-hHRmRipz8Osw@mail.gmail.com> <9A7BDB22F3A0396EF24BF91D@PSB> <5772045E-2EB3-44B7-BCA8-0135DF809C62@dukhovni.org> <68cd718f-3bf5-3906-25e1-94ecfdb0ba2f@wizmail.org> <5aef8939-092d-b6e9-9662-4599251fb920@dcrocker.net> <05d6b2cb-ae9f-83eb-28cc-b5cee030906a@wizmail.org> <cf2a53f3-3c4c-6453-0868-82f035d68f6f@dcrocker.net> <CAHej_8=EPsVLZsnh1bHLVxVWd-ZY0qB230LiWXJybTii1aKoLA@mail.gmail.com> <36694a3d-6b25-37aa-7c18-a3a1bbba61be@dcrocker.net> <MN2PR11MB4351E88F5DAB28E8F714BC85F76F9@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <29350ca2-f1eb-092f-f1ec-8bb9e1c6ea55@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:21:58 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4351E88F5DAB28E8F714BC85F76F9@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/1e9iV2Yv9hNscNkbeeN0FyRtAuQ>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Proposed ESMTP keyword RCPTLIMIT
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 20:22:12 -0000

On 3/12/2021 12:11 PM, Brotman, Alex wrote:
> This may not work well in practice.  It's entirely possible that the number of permitted recipients (or any similar limitation) could change during the session as more is learned about the sender. 

I have two responses:

    1.  Wow.

    2.  Don't advertise a number.

If the practice is widespread, then yeah, it's probably not worth doing 
the particular option.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email