Re: [Emailcore] Navigating 5321bis (and predecessors)

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sun, 10 January 2021 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0E03A0BD7 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:41:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KgknGnSsFQh5 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CF23A0BD5 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1kyRbc-000BjW-To; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:41:28 -0500
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:41:22 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
cc: emailcore@ietf.org
Message-ID: <2CA5568312BD9B98191B80FB@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <rtdrrv$u6o$1@gal.iecc.com>
References: <8034D30CAC474E52B15C1AC4@PSB> <5f8f7894-b736-1f15-2dd4-865f68d6702d@tana.it> <306A848BA9E6BE7CC38465E3@PSB> <rtdrrv$u6o$1@gal.iecc.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/Uy9wo8kvuiw4m8hIa1j6L5lU-Kg>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Navigating 5321bis (and predecessors)
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:41:32 -0000


--On Sunday, January 10, 2021 03:21 +0000 John Levine
<johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <306A848BA9E6BE7CC38465E3@PSB>,
> John C Klensin  <john@jck.com> wrote:
>>> I think an index is useless nowadays, since page numbers are
>>> not a univocal reference anymore (they only appear in PDFs
>>> and are presumably going to depend on paper formats.)
> 
> Indices don't have to point to oage numbers.  They can refer to
> section numbers or unsing this new-fangled web thing, they can
> link directly to the relevant sections.

That is more or less what the portion of that note I actually
wrote (as distinct from the quote from Alessandro above).  Did
that not catch up with you and the list?

    john