Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Thu, 10 September 2009 11:13 UTC

Message-Id: <11E021E0-E42B-4FC7-8461-9D453731CA85@rfc1035.com>
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2E7945C8-D55F-4C0E-83EC-71243832D522@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:13:50 +0100
References: <2E7945C8-D55F-4C0E-83EC-71243832D522@cisco.com>
Cc: enum@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused
Precedence: list

On 9 Sep 2009, at 21:01, Cullen Jennings wrote:

> Who is working on this draft these days?

Probably no-one. As Lawrence said, the original authors gave up. There  
was a limit on the number of times we were prepared to bang our heads  
on a brick wall. IIRC Hadriel Kaplan and someone else from Acme Packet  
volunteered to take over the draft at the Philly meeting. It doesn't  
appear to have progressed since then.

> I need someone to remind me of the painful history of this draft.

I doubt if those who have been scarred by that experience want to be  
reminded about it. :-(

[Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Cullen Jennings
Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Richard Shockey
Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Bernie Hoeneisen
Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Lawrence Conroy
Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Richard Shockey
Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Jim Reid
Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Richard Stastny
Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Richard Shockey