Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused
Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk> Wed, 09 September 2009 21:55 UTC
Return-Path: <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C53B3A68B4 for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_AVOID=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBWREOmbbO50 for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from insensate.co.uk (ghost.insensate.co.uk [213.152.49.121]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6901C3A689F for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA35AC59B; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:56:28 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <96E5297A-F5B6-460C-BFDB-0C99FC8A6850@insensate.co.uk>
From: Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
To: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0909092224510.4173@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:56:27 +0100
References: <2E7945C8-D55F-4C0E-83EC-71243832D522@cisco.com> <027f01ca318a$17307520$45915f60$@us> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0909092224510.4173@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: 'Cullen Jennings' <fluffy@cisco.com>, IETF ENUM list <enum@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/enum>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:55:57 -0000
Hi Bernie, folks, Pain? Nah! that doesn't cover it. Regarding what happened next, not a lot. I suspect that Hadriel volunteered without quite understanding what was involved. I think by that point Richard Stastny (who initially proposed this) had retired, Hadriel had implemented this in two flavours for customers -- once in accordance to a VOID draft *and* separately in accordance with an Unused draft. (I believe that something not a million miles away from unused was involved with the Korean ENUM trial as well ;). For me, having moved text in and out and up and down so many time I was losing the ability to see, objections to the data: URL (AFAICT ?!? because it was intrinsically evil?!? - ask Rohan) left me unconvinced that with me at the typewriter there would be any possibility of this getting though IESG before *I* retired. As I can't see anything wrong with it at all in its latest version (having replaced the http: URL with a data: URL as requested), I don't know any more. I do know that this works exactly as described in the draft (qua any typos that drifted into it over the years) -- and quite well, at that. Is that enough? all the best, Lawrence On 9 Sep 2009, at 21:43, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > Hi Rich > > AFAICT Cullen's question refers to the pain around points raised by > the former AD leading to the editor stepping down. > > I found something concering this in the records: > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/enum/minutes?item=minutes71.html > > However, I found no records about what happened afterwards.... > > cheers, > Bernie > > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Richard Shockey wrote: > >> How painful do you want to go ... the problem statement is pretty >> simple how >> do you know if a number has been issued to the carrier but not >> active or has >> any services associated with it. The SIT tone issue. The ENUM >> database needs >> a flag to indicate the status of the number. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: enum-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:enum-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf >>> Of Cullen Jennings >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:02 PM >>> To: enum@ietf.org >>> Subject: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused >>> >>> >>> Who is working on this draft these days? I need someone to remind me >>> of the painful history of this draft. >>> >>> Thanks, Cullen >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> enum mailing list >>> enum@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum >> >> _______________________________________________ >> enum mailing list >> enum@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum >> > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > enum@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Jim Reid
- Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Richard Stastny
- Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused Richard Shockey