Re: [Enum] ENUM WG document status

Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> Wed, 09 September 2009 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D25D3A67AF for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EM6zt50achi6 for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D841428C105 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1MlUBR-0001H8-Og; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:54:29 +0200
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:54:29 +0200
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
In-Reply-To: <028101ca318a$d093b770$71bb2650$@us>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0909092245360.4173@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
References: <028101ca318a$d093b770$71bb2650$@us>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: IETF ENUM list <enum@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Enum] ENUM WG document status
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/enum>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:54:03 -0000

Hi Rich

Thanks for the summary. My comments/updates inline.

On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Richard Shockey wrote:

> draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide
> ----------------------------------
>
> Current Status: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
>
> Open issues: There's a problem with the IETF's Expert Review Process in 
> general, and the Enumservices draft is the document that brought those 
> problems up :-/

That is unfortunately true....:-(

> Bernie has agreed with IANA (Michelle) to add a bit to the text that
> closes the loophole in the process. He will submit a new version, and that
> will hopefully close that issue.
>
> ToDo: Wait for new revision (-17)

Update:
We could close all the open issues and published -17 three weeks ago. 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-17


> draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service
> --------------------------------
>
> Current Status: RFC Editor (AUTH48)
>
> Open Issues: Unfortunately, this draft was submitted to the RFC Editor 
> before work on the Enumservices document was finished - the Enumservice 
> does not fit at all into the Scheme proposed there. There were several 
> discussions between RFC Editors, authors of the draft, and authors of 
> the Enumservices guide, without reaching the "perfect solution".
>
> ToDo: Find solution how to fit Enumservice into the scheme developed in
> Enumservice guide.

Update:
The issues have been closed and RFC 5333 is expected to be published 
within the next days.

cheers,
  Bernie