[Enum] ENUM WG document status
"Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> Wed, 09 September 2009 20:18 UTC
Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982083A680C for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_05=-1.11, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJCdrjTJiS2U for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-mail-156.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-156.bluehost.com [67.222.39.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 164B33A6984 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7067 invoked by uid 0); 9 Sep 2009 20:19:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by outboundproxy5.bluehost.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2009 20:19:31 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=shockey.us; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-Identified-User; b=JVuO1UHVPEp9dLK62e3fTk/OE+SkEUYKCa80upp+PXTR7FQIaTO3/sBtFer9seS64U6ffG4uOmFqzBk0Q4FSqQkQE4XO3xVuU1Wdnrq/4OLqRlbJK+gSSlwq9kF5f/sO;
Received: from pool-173-66-69-164.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.66.69.164] helo=rshockeyPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1MlTdb-0001RE-44 for enum@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:19:31 -0600
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: enum@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:19:19 -0400
Message-ID: <028101ca318a$d093b770$71bb2650$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acoxis/pghnv+ZEIQlOeG5A9PLwJfQ==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 173.66.69.164 authed with richard+shockey.us}
Subject: [Enum] ENUM WG document status
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/enum>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:18:59 -0000
Alex has kindly put together a list of document in the IESG queue and some related issues. If there are any comments here let us know. IETF ENUM WG document status ============================ Alex Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at> Overview: --------- basis for this report is http://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/?&search_filename=enum and some background information gathered from various places and authors.. draft-ietf-enum-3761bis ----------------------- current status: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead Open issues: There seems to be one misleading part in the text, that says: Delegations in the zone e164.arpa (not delegations in delegated domains of e164.arpa) should be done after Expert Review, and the IESG will appoint a designated expert. IANA has a respective comment here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-enum-3761bis/comment/96731/ ToDo: Clarify IANA comment, probably create new revision solving that issue, As ADs for progressing the document draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition --------------------------------------- Current status: Publication Requested Open Issues: This draft has dependencies on the "calendar" ENUMservices (which are currently in AUTH48) - the "calendar" issue needs to be resolved before this draft can progress. ToDo: Clarify "calendar" issues, then modify that draft accordingly. draft-ietf-enum-edns0 --------------------- Current status: Publication requested - Revised ID needed Open Issues: ?? ToDO: ?? draft-ietf-enum-iax ------------------- Current status: AD Evaluation - External Party Open Issues: There is a web link to the IANA URI scheme registration site in the draft, and that was commented on in the Gen-ART review. Full comment is here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg04160.html ToDo: Address Gen-ART comment, resubmit draft. draft-ietf-enum-unused ---------------------- Current status: AD Evaluation - revised ID needed Open Issues: The PROTO writeup for the draft is missing (comment from Cullen Jennings). The "revised ID needed" status exists since 2008 - As far as i remember this was because of concerns regarding the "application level interaction" with the properties of DNS? ToDo: ?? draft-ietf-enum-cnam -------------------- Current status: Waiting for Writeup - Revised ID needed Todo: ?? (Rich?) On my list ... draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide ---------------------------------- Current Status: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead Open issues: There's a problem with the IETF's Expert Review Process in general, and the Enumservices draft is the document that brought those problems up :-/ Bernie has agreed with IANA (Michelle) to add a bit to the text that closes the loophole in the process. He will submit a new version, and that will hopefully close that issue. ToDo: Wait for new revision (-17) draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service -------------------------------- Current Status: RFC Editor (AUTH48) Open Issues: Unfortunately, this draft was submitted to the RFC Editor before work on the Enumservices document was finished - the Enumservice does not fit at all into the Scheme proposed there. There were several discussions between RFC Editors, authors of the draft, and authors of the Enumservices guide, without reaching the "perfect solution". ToDo: Find solution how to fit Enumservice into the scheme developed in Enumservice guide. Richard Shockey PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683 <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> skype/AIM: rshockey101 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/rshockey101
- [Enum] ENUM WG document status Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG document status Bernie Hoeneisen