Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused

Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> Wed, 09 September 2009 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2203A6A2E for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28a0H2656bkP for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A0E3A6984 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1MlU0g-0001Fv-BR; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:43:22 +0200
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:43:22 +0200
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
In-Reply-To: <027f01ca318a$17307520$45915f60$@us>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0909092224510.4173@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
References: <2E7945C8-D55F-4C0E-83EC-71243832D522@cisco.com> <027f01ca318a$17307520$45915f60$@us>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: 'Cullen Jennings' <fluffy@cisco.com>, IETF ENUM list <enum@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/enum>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:42:55 -0000

Hi Rich

AFAICT Cullen's question refers to the pain around points raised by the 
former AD leading to the editor stepping down.

I found something concering this in the records:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/enum/minutes?item=minutes71.html

However, I found no records about what happened afterwards....

cheers,
  Bernie


On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Richard Shockey wrote:

> How painful do you want to go ... the problem statement is pretty simple how
> do you know if a number has been issued to the carrier but not active or has
> any services associated with it. The SIT tone issue. The ENUM database needs
> a flag to indicate the status of the number.
>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: enum-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:enum-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>>  Of Cullen Jennings
>>  Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:02 PM
>>  To: enum@ietf.org
>>  Subject: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused
>>
>>
>>  Who is working on this draft these days? I need someone to remind me
>>  of the painful history of this draft.
>>
>>  Thanks, Cullen
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  enum mailing list
>>  enum@ietf.org
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> enum@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>