Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-03

Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at> Tue, 21 November 2006 15:20 UTC

Message-ID: <45631923.8030802@enum.at>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:20:03 +0100
From: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at>
Organization: enum.at GmbH
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lconroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-03
References: <4561CBF0.1060600@enum.at> <EA7D93DB-5C19-4080-9C75-4CA8753C614A@insensate.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EA7D93DB-5C19-4080-9C75-4CA8753C614A@insensate.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'enum@ietf.org'" <enum@ietf.org>, Stastny Richard <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>, "Pfautz, Penn L, NEO" <ppfautz@att.com>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org

lconroy wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>   OK, whilst we're at the level of boilerplate changes, I believe that I-Ds
> are supposed to indicate their intended status (i.e. what track they're
> on).
> Most all of the other drafts in the WG don't, but at the top of the
> document
> you could put in "Intended Status: Informational".

yep. Afaik leaving that out means "standards track".

> Look at <draft-ietf-enum-edns0-00.txt> as an example of a draft aimed at
> BCP status. (It's VERY easy to do if the draft is XML-based and uses
> XML2RFC).
> 
> Also, the citation of the requirements document needs to be updated.

thanks for catching that, Lawrence.

cheers

Alex

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

[Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrastruct… Alexander Mayrhofer
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Richard Shockey
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… lconroy
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Alexander Mayrhofer
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Richard Shockey
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Livingood, Jason
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Livingood, Jason
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Livingood, Jason
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Clive D.W. Feather
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… home_pw
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… lconroy
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Michael Hammer (mhammer)
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Lupton, Ronan
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Clive D.W. Feather
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Clive D.W. Feather
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Michael Hammer (mhammer)
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Tony Rutkowski
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Andrew Newton
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Lupton, Ronan
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Otmar Lendl
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Rosbotham, Paul
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Otmar Lendl
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Richard Shockey
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Antoin Verschuren
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Otmar Lendl
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Stastny Richard
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Richard Shockey
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Peter Williams
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Richard Shockey
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Stastny Richard
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Dale.Worley
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Stastny Richard
RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Michael Hammer (mhammer)
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Otmar Lendl
Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrast… Jay Daley