RE: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-03

Did any of you get this message?

I'm running into mail problems it seems.

Yes this is informational .. but can we get the correct boiler plate on this
so I can take it and the BLR and combined into WGLC.

BTW Alex have you given the latest BLR and enum combined the nits test?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Mayrhofer [mailto:alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:20 AM
> To: lconroy
> Cc: 'enum@ietf.org'; Stastny Richard; Livingood,Jason; Pfautz, Penn L,NEO
> Subject: Re: [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-03
> 
> lconroy wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >   OK, whilst we're at the level of boilerplate changes, I believe that
> I-Ds
> > are supposed to indicate their intended status (i.e. what track they're
> > on).
> > Most all of the other drafts in the WG don't, but at the top of the
> > document
> > you could put in "Intended Status: Informational".
> 
> yep. Afaik leaving that out means "standards track".
> 
> > Look at <draft-ietf-enum-edns0-00.txt> as an example of a draft aimed at
> > BCP status. (It's VERY easy to do if the draft is XML-based and uses
> > XML2RFC).
> >
> > Also, the citation of the requirements document needs to be updated.
> 
> thanks for catching that, Lawrence.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> enum@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum