Re: [Enum] Comments on draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-enum-reqs

Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@verisign.com> Thu, 23 November 2006 17:20 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnIF6-0006sw-Ov; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:20:08 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnIF5-0006sq-6h for enum@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:20:07 -0500
Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnIF4-0001Xc-1O for enum@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:20:07 -0500
Received: from dul1wnexcn02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (dul1wnexcn02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.170.12.139]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kANHKAF8015795; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:20:12 -0500
Received: from trutkowski-desk.verisign.com ([10.26.0.245]) by dul1wnexcn02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:20:02 -0500
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:20:00 -0500
To: Otmar Lendl <lendl@nic.at>, enum@ietf.org
From: Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@verisign.com>
Subject: Re: [Enum] Comments on draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-enum-reqs
In-Reply-To: <20061123165645.GA26860@nic.at>
References: <34DA635B184A644DA4588E260EC0A25A0E28DF4E@ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd.att.com> <200611231605.kANG5xbG005934@dragon.ariadne.com> <20061123165645.GA26860@nic.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <DUL1WNEXCN028KK8ZtP000015fc@dul1wnexcn02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2006 17:20:03.0088 (UTC) FILETIME=[9CB75100:01C70F23]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Cc:
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Otmar,

>I agree with Richard here: I-ENUM should return an AoR which act
>as a "name" and does not contain source specific routing information.

But isn't this relevant under the Missoula Plan?

--tony 


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum