Re: [Enum] Comments on draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-enum-reqs

   From: "Pfautz, Penn L, GBLAM" <ppfautz@att.com>

   The requirement you propose is actually much different and, while the
   initial (e.g., Tier 1)
   response may not be origin-sensitive, further processing is likely to be
   since
   A carrier may have different POIs for different interconnection
   partners.

Hmmm...  If that's so, you might want to add some explication of that
in the requirements.  The current definition suggests to the naive
that the mapping from E.164 number to URI is offered to all comers .

Indeed, from a technological point of view, it's a fairly complex
feature to allow different mappings to be delivered to requests made
on behalf of different originating parties.

Dale

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum