RE: [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressingsystem?
Robert.Shaw@itu.int Tue, 07 February 2006 15:53 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F6V9R-0003Fy-AR; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:53:09 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F6V9K-00037V-D9 for enum@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:53:07 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05813 for <enum@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:51:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert.Shaw@itu.int
Received: from protext02.itu.ch ([156.106.192.19]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6VLj-0004k2-4U for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:05:51 -0500
Received: from protext02.itu.ch ([156.106.192.19]) by protext02.itu.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:52:33 +0100
Received: From PROTINT1.blue.itu.ch ([156.106.128.47]) by protext02.itu.ch (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 113932755366; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:52:33 +0100
Received: from MAILBOX1.blue.itu.ch ([156.106.130.106]) by PROTINT1.blue.itu.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:52:32 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressingsystem?
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:52:30 +0100
Message-ID: <2ECA12DF5FCB7948A1CD9047C3DAF3DC010DDFA7@MAILBOX1.blue.itu.ch>
Thread-Topic: [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressingsystem?
Thread-Index: AcYrwI7+uWvK8J5uRVuyJ8CBkI74WgAJ7DSQAAT3CsA=
To: ppfautz@att.com, klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at, duane@e164.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2006 15:52:32.0912 (UTC) FILETIME=[81FC4900:01C62BFE]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: enum@ietf.org, speermint@ietf.org, lconroy@insensate.co.uk, trutkowski@verisign.com
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org
> All neat stuff I'm sure. But it lacks the kind of universality and > authoritativeness that are ultimately required for a system > that's going to be more than an adjunct, however popular. Indeed. There are about 3.4 billion mobile + fixed subscribers out there with most of them now *mobile* and growing fast. At this time, provider-based URI schemes are barely a blip on this radar screen. > Maybe the time is right for another Theodore Vail. The logic of this is lost on me. A cornerstone of Vail's strategy was to dominate by control over technology. Been there. Done that. RS _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- RE: [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers … Robert.Shaw
- Re: [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers … Alexander Mayrhofer