Re: [Enum] requesting reviewers for draft-ietf-enum-xmpp..

Duane <duane@e164.org> Fri, 19 January 2007 18:12 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7yEH-00032X-Co; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:12:45 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7yEF-00031i-Oe for enum@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:12:43 -0500
Received: from wodka.aus-biz.com ([65.23.153.32]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7yE8-00070w-Kp for enum@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:12:43 -0500
Received: from [172.17.1.113] (unknown [202.10.81.200]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by wodka.aus-biz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C242B11A597 for <enum@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:12:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <45B10A13.4010000@e164.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:12:35 +1100
From: Duane <duane@e164.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (X11/20061206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: enum@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Enum] requesting reviewers for draft-ietf-enum-xmpp..
References: <456C52F5.20203@enum.at> <456C9D3C.6040104@e164.org> <20061128225646.GB26860@nic.at> <456CD852.1010303@e164.org> <456DB8A8.5000200@enum.at> <237A2882-907D-4BCA-8FDF-85ACE781FAEF@insensate.co.uk> <456E7B25.6010701@e164.org> <45948D80.2010309@e164.org> <200701191756.l0JHuf90011958@dragon.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <200701191756.l0JHuf90011958@dragon.ariadne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org

Dale.Worley@comcast.net wrote:

> The reason this works is that although, as you say, this requires
> clients "to handshake to indicate what they can accept", SIP *already*
> does the handshaking to determine which UA can accept what.

As I stated, the down side to leaving it up to proxies etc to figure out 
who can support what is that could introduce lag in the call setups, but 
this on it's own shouldn't be too bad, but combined with times to do 
enum lookups in the first place, is this likely to be a problem?

-- 

Best regards,
  Duane

http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP

"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right,
     but the optimist has a better time on the trip."

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum