[Errata-design] sanity notwithstanding...

"Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 19 December 2014 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: errata-design@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: errata-design@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1284418123F for <errata-design@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:41:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZaEuQVpmLHCi for <errata-design@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8B318008C for <errata-design@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:41:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4191E52BA for <errata-design@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:41:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id swAHv93nvTHF for <errata-design@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Heathers-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [98.125.220.142]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 244AA1E52B4 for <errata-design@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5494555A.7010608@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:42:02 -0800
From: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: errata-design@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Errata-design] sanity notwithstanding...
X-BeenThere: errata-design@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <errata-design.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/errata-design>, <mailto:errata-design-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/errata-design/>
List-Post: <mailto:errata-design@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:errata-design-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/errata-design>, <mailto:errata-design-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:41:42 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We have a list.

Any feedback on the goals and possible additional participants?

- ----

Initial volunteers: Joel, Ted, Pete, Barry, Stephen, Sandy

Suggested additions: Robert Sparks, Nevil Brownlee, Lars Eggert, Carsten
Bormann, Marc Petit-Huguenin

Goal:
The RFC Series began posting errata in 2000; the current system kicked
off in towards the end of 2007.  The purpose of the system is to keep a
record of errors in the document series; a particularly important action
when it comes to errors that impact implementation of a standard.
Individuals interact with the errata system as submitters, reviewers,
approvers, and consumers, and may cross over roles depending on the
actions they are performing (e.g., reporting an error, looking for
errors as they implement or create a -bis doc, etc.)

Over the last several years, there have been a variety of requests with
regards to the errata system, including requests to do away with the
errata system, requests to expand the errata system to include more than
just errors, and requests to try and streamline the process for
submission and approval.  In addition, a need to consider how the
errata system will handle the new format era, when RFCs are represented
in more than one format with slightly different content (i.e., artwork)
has been thrown into the mix.

The purpose of the design team is to review the existing errata process,
discuss the various requests for change and enhancement, and recommend a
model going forward that could in turn be used as requirements for any
programming effort going forward.  The work, including the time needed
to implement at least the format-related changes in the system, will
ideally be done before the format changes are in production (est Q4
2015/Q1 2016).


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUlFVZAAoJEER/xjINbZoGbsUH/A2iWW0j101qm8TIO1Wl2A8/
WcSm6UfbJ+HrHSRkeJvPcSfFAnF0EnoCx7C004L0mcFRLiudqtC/CZnckrgVR6Ao
78JzUiLNtMznMVl9HPZrxEhNyINKoDAlzF8EzDinLOsE84ul5Q4MjlVijzo1bPm6
pIuMUA6qI/aQ14p+XddVNKS6Gd6ktu5i+zqSwVVpeLsMkTxmMu430MVKkJIEDsyz
FGJ7o1qVfpW90urznTB5KDBkTgMHtgh39TBp2Id+iI9imyPmC7+nK6kAi12WOy31
6IF3In+KnHwBMjdbQELvK2/rkq1vbxdil/wB4UUIq2vt+DZ4H2m0ditA1aBZarY=
=ldEn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----