IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Suggested corrections to FDDI MIB Version 2.1

CASE@utkvx.utcc.utk.edu Tue, 24 November 1992 05:29 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20508; 24 Nov 92 0:29 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20504; 24 Nov 92 0:29 EST
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14699; 24 Nov 92 0:29 EST
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA03205; Tue, 24 Nov 92 00:00:12 -0500
Received: from UTKVX2.UTK.EDU by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA03200; Tue, 24 Nov 92 00:00:09 -0500
Received: from utkvx.utk.edu by utkvx.utk.edu (PMDF #3151 ) id <01GRICUP54LW96VU4D@utkvx.utk.edu>; Mon, 23 Nov 1992 23:59:58 EDT
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 23:59:58 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: CASE@utkvx.utcc.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Suggested corrections to FDDI MIB Version 2.1
To: dsiinc!rem@uunet.uu.net
Cc: fddi-mib@cs.utk.edu
Message-Id: <01GRICUP5E9296VU4D@utkvx.utk.edu>
X-Vms-To: IN%"dsiinc!rem@uunet.uu.net"
X-Vms-Cc: IN%"fddi-mib@cs.utk.edu",CASE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

thanks to all who continue to provide good comments on the current
document

i believe i am capturing them all

if a correction goes unopposed for a couple of days, i'm assuming
it's a good correction and is going in the document

silence implies assent -- which, of course, can be reversed later by speaking
up -- as long as its not too much later

once again, thanks to all for your diligence

regards,
jdc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email