[Forces-protocol] RE: Protocol presentation comments

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Sun, 07 November 2004 18:29 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA10666 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:29:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQrnF-0000NQ-Ln for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:29:37 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CQrmA-0002FE-5t; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:28:30 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CQrjM-0001a0-3M for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:25:36 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA10469 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:25:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fmr05.intel.com ([] helo=hermes.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQrjf-0000Il-8s for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:25:59 -0500
Received: from petasus.jf.intel.com (petasus.jf.intel.com []) by hermes.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id iA7ITFPO003135; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 18:29:15 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com []) by petasus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.11 2004/07/29 22:51:53 root Exp $) with SMTP id iA7ISj4X017403; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 18:28:50 GMT
Received: from orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([]) by orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP with SMTP id M2004110710245219589 ; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 10:24:52 -0800
Received: from orsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([]) by orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:24:52 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:24:22 -0800
Message-ID: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579266@orsmsx408>
Thread-Topic: Protocol presentation comments
Thread-Index: AcTE8CjfP1fBlbMdQQaKzwJZCnwyYwABOqlQ
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2004 18:24:52.0360 (UTC) FILETIME=[12BDA080:01C4C4F7]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6cca30437e2d04f45110f2ff8dc1b1d5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "\(Ram Gopal \)" <ram.gopal@nokia.com>, Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, "Putzolu, David" <david.putzolu@intel.com>, Dong Ligang <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: [Forces-protocol] RE: Protocol presentation comments
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 31247fb3be228bb596db9127becad0bc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


I was specifically talking about slide 5 in which you have mentioned
your opinions on what you think the drafts support...for e.g., I don't
think the Audu proposal is SCTP/UDP, from my reading it was SCTP/DCCP
and my proposal is not Unicast only. We have never discussed any of
these proposals in the protocol team and neither have these proposals
been presented at the IETF...dont you think its inappropriate for these
to be discussed in our presentation before the actual TML proposals are

If you would just mention the proposals without getting into their
details, that would be fine. They will be presented at this meeting in
any case.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@znyx.com] 
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 11:25 PM
To: Khosravi, Hormuzd M
Cc: Robert Haas; Weiming Wang; Avri Doria; Dong Ligang; (Ram Gopal );
forces-protocol@ietf.org; Putzolu, David
Subject: Re: Protocol presentation comments


Can you point me to exactly what you dont like about the two slides
i put on the TML?
More importantly point me to my "opinions" on those two slides.
I will not remove the slides on TML - I think its a fundamental part of
ForCES. If you have something specific to point to, it would be valuable
to consider.


On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 16:37, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:
> Hi Jamal,
> I went thru the protocol presentation that you put together...
> One comment, you should not be presenting your opinions on the TML
> drafts which are being presented at this meeting. This is beyond the
> scope of the protocol draft anyways, I am not sure why you have slides
> on this? But it would strongly recommend against this. I don't believe
> these have been discussed by the protocol team in emails or meetings.
> Thanks
> Hormuzd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@znyx.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 4:25 PM
> To: Robert Haas
> Cc: Weiming Wang; Khosravi, Hormuzd M; Avri Doria; Dong Ligang; (Ram
> Gopal )
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options
> forLFB-level multicast]
> Robert,
> I saw your presentation. Looks fine. Apologies, havent had time to
> on the protocol one. I am trying not to have too many slides.
> Heres a start that i will refine later. 
> I was trying to build upto a point where i could explain the different
> views of "path" - I will still do that if theres 
> a) view i should  or b) time allows it
> cheers,
> jamal

Forces-protocol mailing list