Re: List merging?
Philippe Prindeville <email@example.com> Fri, 16 November 1990 16:37 UTC
Received: from inria.inria.fr by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06628;
16 Nov 90 11:37 EST
Received: by inria.inria.fr (5.65+/90.0.9) via Fnet-EUnet id AA08464; Fri, 16 Nov 90 17:36:00 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 90 17:36:00 +0100
From: Philippe Prindeville <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: List merging?
Cc: frame-relay@NRI.Reston.VA.US, gvaudre@NRI.Reston.VA.US, iplpdn@NRI.Reston.VA.US, email@example.com, smds@NRI.Reston.VA.US
To: Frank Kastenholz <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: frame-relay@NRI.Reston.VA.US, email@example.com, smds@NRI.Reston.VA.US, iplpdn@NRI.Reston.VA.US, gvaudre@NRI.Reston.VA.US Subject: Re: List merging? Date: Thu, 15 Nov 90 10:20:57 -0500 From: Greg Vaudreuil <gvaudre@NRI.Reston.VA.US> 1) IP framing over Frame Relay. I understand frame-relay to be essentially a point to point service, and I have heard that PPP can be extended to include frame-relay support. To the best of my knowlege (Stev Knowles?) this has not been exaustively explored. and will need to be to get this service up. Inquire on the PPP mailing list.... I still believe Frame-Relay to be simple, quick, and efficient. In order to keep this so, let's not drag PPP into it... Thanks, -Philip P.S. When is relay.cs.net going to figure out that legit names (ie. with MX records) don't need to be (and shouldn't be!) percentized (ie. firstname.lastname@example.org)?