Re: List merging?

Philippe Prindeville <prindevi@inria.inria.fr> Fri, 16 November 1990 16:37 UTC

Received: from inria.inria.fr by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06628; 16 Nov 90 11:37 EST
Received: by inria.inria.fr (5.65+/90.0.9) via Fnet-EUnet id AA08464; Fri, 16 Nov 90 17:36:00 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 90 17:36:00 +0100
From: Philippe Prindeville <prindevi@inria.inria.fr>
Message-Id: <9011161636.AA08464@inria.inria.fr>
To: kasten%europa.interlan.com@relay.cs.net
Subject: Re: List merging?
Cc: frame-relay@NRI.Reston.VA.US, gvaudre@NRI.Reston.VA.US, iplpdn@NRI.Reston.VA.US, kwe%buitb.bu.edu@relay.cs.net, smds@NRI.Reston.VA.US

	To: Frank Kastenholz <kasten%europa.interlan.com@relay.cs.net>
	Cc: frame-relay@NRI.Reston.VA.US, kwe%buitb.bu.edu@relay.cs.net,
	        smds@NRI.Reston.VA.US, iplpdn@NRI.Reston.VA.US,
	        gvaudre@NRI.Reston.VA.US
	Subject: Re: List merging? 
	Date: Thu, 15 Nov 90 10:20:57 -0500
	From: Greg Vaudreuil <gvaudre@NRI.Reston.VA.US>
	
	1) IP framing over Frame Relay.  I understand frame-relay to be
	   essentially a point to point service, and I have heard that PPP can
	   be extended to include frame-relay support.  To the best of my
	   knowlege (Stev Knowles?) this has not been exaustively explored.
	   and will need to be to get this service up.  Inquire on the PPP
	   mailing list....
	
I still believe Frame-Relay to be simple, quick, and efficient.  In
order to keep this so, let's not drag PPP into it...

Thanks,

-Philip

P.S.	When is relay.cs.net going to figure out that legit names
	(ie. with MX records) don't need to be (and shouldn't be!)
	percentized (ie. user%good.domain@relay.cs.net)?