Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more review

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Tue, 26 July 2011 04:18 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F125921F8B08 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBEZ++kRIBwk for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com (mail-ey0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF3921F8B07 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so79825eya.21 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JSb3EnMlqElsVdjbz2YMw4k6GLNmLD2rLfyg0e12Lss=; b=v1cUEF1q1eXv/DUufe+a/8G2nEg3m0FKPEZAzc484kMQv6Tz0NNWWXHxeF7EeWnVZo C54MXe37F7mu9HzXeZwXCJ3Qu3wIbfTDPXzzFnQxaGlv1Hz6ezhPwCot8YmCpGLwNgHJ ud7AIbWyYy4z5ov1hJQN6XdBkwnIAjcVJZklY=
Received: by 10.204.132.200 with SMTP id c8mr1679200bkt.235.1311653910171; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s14sm23058bkw.52.2011.07.25.21.18.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E2E403E.7040509@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:19:10 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ftpext@ietf.org
References: <CANqTPeggME=FCiTDpAPAMEcNq36zpojshE6W-=PHtB9it+AZZQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107222237120.1581@tvnag.unkk.fr> <OFE237FE3A.1794CEA8-ON802578D8.0039F193-802578D8.003A1E6B@uk.ibm.com> <01AA9EC92749BF4894AC2B3039EA4A2C194E2EA3@CH1PRD0302MB131.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <01AA9EC92749BF4894AC2B3039EA4A2C194E2EA3@CH1PRD0302MB131.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more review
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:18:32 -0000

26.07.2011 5:17, Robert McMurray wrote:
> "Server-FTP processes that conform to this specification MUST treat a situation where the HOST command is issued more than once before the user has been authenticated as though a previous HOST command was not sent, and return the appropriate reply for the new HOST command. Server-FTP processes MUST treat a situation where the HOST command is issued after the user has been authenticated as an erroneous sequence of commands and return a 503 reply."
>
> Of course, in situations where a server-FTP process does NOT implement the HOST command, the server-FTP process will return a 500 or 502 reply, as it would with any other unrecognized command.
+1.  Such approach seems to be fine and wise.  I think the document is 
now ready for IESG review.  Mykyta