Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more review
Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Fri, 22 July 2011 20:43 UTC
Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5F921F8B09 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.929
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.929 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.680, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I2TiA5aeurJz for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7808421F87C2 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2) with ESMTP id p6MKhXYq006457; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:43:33 +0200
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:43:33 +0200
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANqTPeggME=FCiTDpAPAMEcNq36zpojshE6W-=PHtB9it+AZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107222237120.1581@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <CANqTPeggME=FCiTDpAPAMEcNq36zpojshE6W-=PHtB9it+AZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Greylist: Default is to whitelist mail, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.8 (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more review
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:43:52 -0000
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Anthony Bryan wrote:
> if you have reviewed HOST before, please review any changes in the past few
> months. if you have comments, please make sure that they have been addressed
> to your satisfaction and state whether you are for or against the approval
> of HOST (even if you have in the past).
I got back to this spec now and I still think the HOST should accept a port
number and with the -03's new section 3.2.2 where it says:
If a user-PI sends an additional HOST command before attempting to
authenticate the user, a server-FTP process that conforms to this
specification MUST treat the additional HOST command as though a REIN
command was sent,
... I think even more strongly than before that it would make more sense to
have section 3's two alternative versions a and b just be the version B as
then a "wrongly placed" HOST would always imply a REIN. Nice and simple.
It seems we won't get a lot more feedback on this spec in this WG.
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
- [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more review Anthony Bryan
- Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more rev… Daniel Stenberg
- Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more rev… Paul Ford-Hutchinson
- Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more rev… Robert McMurray
- Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more rev… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more rev… Alun Jones
- Re: [ftpext] HOST back to FTPEXT2 WG for more rev… Robert McMurray