IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort

Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com> Fri, 01 July 2011 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <soohongp@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C094811E80E2 for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 02:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.525, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-K17lYysQTU for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 02:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A44911E80D1 for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 02:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so1253316eye.31 for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LlC52J23nS/E7PlylsvFEEgW8NzAKVobCnVPZ70ec0c=; b=J7pMexc5oQoPMuAXbvO2+U/CgdA8jieXnbTeFTSJLYePe1d+ff/btSnM6y9OFH7BLN 4Jcm58kUWSDGtNI2zIcRjzX7/aCO6X+UxHPVJ97xTkfu0+FFMEm4zy/pVi9lhqs8tqz7 sobWsDSk2iGQiLpXDXLy1vY8s6gr+OJ+GF3ow=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.35.163 with SMTP id u35mr868426eea.232.1309512669844; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.97.75 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 02:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.97.75 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 02:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E0D902A.4070807@piuha.net>
References: <4E0AE3CF.2070504@piuha.net> <4E0CB009.9070104@piuha.net> <D8210E9F-08A7-4C62-98BC-A31CF0D1720D@gmail.com> <4E0D902A.4070807@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:31:09 +0900
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=NkP4h2OePPO6KRYFK5ARLQ2KzTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e659fcec83d51604a6fead96"
Cc: "fun@ietf.org" <fun@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:31:11 -0000

Yes, since I was also a member of that TF within DLNA. But, I do not quite
sure now whether we can  share that whitepaper in ietf due to DLNA
membership policy.

Daniel

Soohong Daniel Park
from Galaxy S, twitter: @natpt
2011. 7. 1. 오후 6:15에 "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>님이 작성:
> Daniel,
>> Presumably, the architrcture includes an analysis work considering the
current home networking solutions, particulary DLNA. Correct? In fact, DLNA
did the IPv6 over DLNA work before through a IPv6 Task Force, and came up
with the whitepaper several years back. IPv6 is not well and widely embedded
into DLNA yet though. Just curious how interop and harmonize between ietf
work and DLNA. The past DLAN deliverable/efforts might be referred, and used
for this Homenet work.
>>
>
> Yes. There needs to be an awareness and analysis of everything that
> already exists -- DHCP components, V6OPS documents on simple security,
> DLNA work, UPnP work, etc.
>
> Do you have a reference to the whitepaper and other associated
> information at DLNA?
>
> Jari
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email