IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 01 July 2011 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2281E11E80A8 for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 02:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.038
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.038 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vAAANdmlMHDf for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 02:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742A711E809A for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 02:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E242CC3B; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:15:23 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQrD5RDSHsIB; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:15:23 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4C02CC39; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:15:22 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4E0D902A.4070807@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:15:22 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Soohong Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
References: <4E0AE3CF.2070504@piuha.net> <4E0CB009.9070104@piuha.net> <D8210E9F-08A7-4C62-98BC-A31CF0D1720D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D8210E9F-08A7-4C62-98BC-A31CF0D1720D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "fun@ietf.org" <fun@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:15:26 -0000

Daniel,
> Presumably, the architrcture includes an analysis work considering the current home networking solutions, particulary DLNA. Correct? In fact, DLNA did the IPv6 over DLNA work before through a IPv6 Task Force, and came up with the whitepaper several years back. IPv6 is not well and widely embedded into DLNA yet though. Just curious how interop and harmonize between ietf work and DLNA. The past DLAN deliverable/efforts might be referred, and used for this Homenet work.
>   

Yes. There needs to be an awareness and analysis of everything that 
already exists -- DHCP components, V6OPS documents on simple security, 
DLNA work, UPnP work, etc.

Do you have a reference to the whitepaper and other associated 
information at DLNA?

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email