IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 01 July 2011 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB9121F86FD for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Of-HRnEWRJzz for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 03:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD5521F86F6 for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 03:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4514E9E; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:19:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CA49A; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:19:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:19:59 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=NkP4h2OePPO6KRYFK5ARLQ2KzTw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107011216180.31677@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <4E0AE3CF.2070504@piuha.net> <4E0CB009.9070104@piuha.net> <D8210E9F-08A7-4C62-98BC-A31CF0D1720D@gmail.com> <4E0D902A.4070807@piuha.net> <BANLkTi=NkP4h2OePPO6KRYFK5ARLQ2KzTw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "fun@ietf.org" <fun@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:20:02 -0000

On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Daniel Park wrote:

> Yes, since I was also a member of that TF within DLNA. But, I do not 
> quite sure now whether we can share that whitepaper in ietf due to DLNA 
> membership policy.

Reading up on www.dlna.org it seems the way this organisation operates and 
envisions future development is incompatible with how the IETF operates?

<http://www.dlna.org/about_us/faqs/>

"The DLNA Guidelines are available to DLNA Member companies for free and 
to purchase for non-DLNA Members."

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email