Re: [gaia] draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments. Mitar review, question #3. Typical scenarios

"Rute C. Sofia" <rute.sofia@ulusofona.pt> Wed, 13 April 2016 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rute.sofia@ulusofona.pt>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA21F12DBBF for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 05:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ulusofona-pt.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hrtxdIVeVqa0 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 05:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BEC12DFF2 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n3so75423009wmn.0 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ulusofona-pt.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to; bh=HY9ycMDpLvLAyypdfBWg7pAGBKkUGfCLqhiyh6a6i+Q=; b=vFoxmyfTtovwqw0ywXDh9SsFIoBRbJZU3jAG1YFsvPS3VOjzppFznPKpu8nyEZ96rZ tNiF3o6szGn5bo5gbZrU9hkBJ2J3X2sb+EAw1QShZ4JbYCw9GIwBrLR7rMeTTTt/m5OT j0P4jM1o12VJviO/QrkRRl9S9fvJbZdSd4eQ2hvf5kvfED8Xa4+9IUd1MSwEe2DtaMkX xohCspdXzPdR7nCz7iBYaWb/chS9mAT9Ns116y4fq0MMj7hS2afqbsHdK8hf69ygsPMZ Et/3Wj+lwNMbi9SLNg3CmhqX6nAZ0BfRyQvVpstt2UKrm9F/lfsfgbd/Pg86pAiizJUZ 1E/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to; bh=HY9ycMDpLvLAyypdfBWg7pAGBKkUGfCLqhiyh6a6i+Q=; b=NCcB8JmL9YopuENSMttuEgNPg8FB0XjaGXJICWqTyH70MnHyZq4lG/GULyyzW3V0f1 0n48EU6m2dWCdHubSFWCZQlvcyFaulQ+4IstRDeOQOZTpgG5T2gkxdzeLZVGz7fF6avH vcMyF6mGDrS6cLS2UZ9Kk5oike/o9Z+kh6Fx5RLsXldQDtFCKlFt4i57FSzOAx3qo5Dh SryzsSjJ6kbCtM3SAusHImAy+gjVnRVawg8ug/zQvkKAoUiHeWkxUnoPPG6IORo7QOWI pV4PDTcFJ8FyARbQ/x1MepIiibeiVhhSnGDb9uo4S3tUElll7UadhImWUTPEj0o3NWKd PVMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVoRArTf6l9DC8pwdXF8Wv/2VMl6TNxdrU9ezkxpRKbJ/aCykhp2q0Wv4mJPagDUugi
X-Received: by 10.194.248.135 with SMTP id ym7mr9628605wjc.174.1460550988949; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 05:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-spcm.site (sitivoip.ulusofona.pt. [193.137.75.156]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm38329418wje.43.2016.04.13.05.36.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 05:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <570E3D4B.1000501@ulusofona.pt>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:36:27 +0100
From: "Rute C. Sofia" <rute.sofia@ulusofona.pt>
Organization: COPELABS, ULHT
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arjuna Sathiaseelan <arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Jim Forster <jrforster@mac.com>
References: <005a01d194c5$96d7d390$c4877ab0$@unizar.es> <CACDvGudjKEsyt-4CJNmREOfJN+c3yKWYWQL3_cBuW+Nkv6BwAg@mail.gmail.com> <CACgrgBaTKKzQx7j05xVMquaamPeOyvWoM4eUD0RJPd4YxochQA@mail.gmail.com> <B65CAC3D-FDA8-4CB2-A65A-35EC94A8B9C8@mac.com> <CAPaG1An-DF7iFzMakDC3Q1T7Oz-gXFRFeuSdb5+q5R9vOJRnNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPaG1An-DF7iFzMakDC3Q1T7Oz-gXFRFeuSdb5+q5R9vOJRnNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060207070202090605040206"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/GDPmlmMpOQYr9h39snL0xnAWe7o>
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>, "Eric A. BREWER" <brewer@berkeley.edu>, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>, Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [gaia] draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments. Mitar review, question #3. Typical scenarios
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rute.sofia@ulusofona.pt
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:36:34 -0000

Hello Arjuna, Henning, Jim,

The rural area definition relates with density. In the USA, 
https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/urban-rural.html
The Census Bureau identifies two types of urban areas:

  * Urbanized Areas (UAs) of 50,000 or more people;
  * Urban Clusters (UCs) of at least 2,500 and less than 50,000 people.

“Rural” encompasses all population, housing, and territory not included 
within an urban area.

In Europe 
(http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/work/2014_01_new_urban.pdf)
Thinly populated area (alternative name: rural area)
      •    More than 50 % of the population living in rural
grid cells.

So, defining rural as thinly populated areas is relevant (and then, 
defining "thinly" :)). Despite the fact that (some) rural areas may be 
sustainable, the fact is that rural areas, due to lack of 
density/capilarity should be treated as a specific type of "smart" 
communities...

BR
Rute

On 04/13/2016 01:24 PM, Arjuna Sathiaseelan wrote:les
> Hello Jim & Henning -
>
> I think Henning has raised an interesting & thought provoking question 
> - how do we define rural?
>
> I agree - if you see in the UK and other "developed" countries - many 
> multi billionaires live in rural areas -
> look at weybridge in the UK: 
> http://www.hamptons.co.uk/forsaleoffice/weybridge/1599/
>
> :)
>
> should we consider from a "network access" perspective areas like 
> Weybridge as really rural -
>
> should rural be classified from an affordability angle? but in urban 
> areas affordability is also an issue - so that leads me to
>
> maybe - we should have new classification probably not by geography 
> but rather socio-economic status?
>
> regards
>
> On 13 April 2016 at 02:37, Jim Forster <jrforster@mac.com 
> <mailto:jrforster@mac.com>> wrote:
>
>     (Perhaps covered already in the draft…)
>
>     Sometimes, especially in developing countries, rural also loosely
>     implies a poorer economic situation (average income per capita)
>     than metro areas in the same country, and frequently reduced
>     general infrastructure (roads, water systems, grid power) than the
>     metro areas.  I think one of the drivers for migration to cities
>     in developing counties is somewhat better infrastructure in cities
>     than in the rural areas.
>
>
>>     On Apr 12, 2016, at 6:59 PM, Henning Schulzrinne
>>     <hgs@cs.columbia.edu <mailto:hgs@cs.columbia.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>     Defining "rural" is surprisingly difficult - the US government is
>>     rumored to have 50 definitions. From a networking perspective,
>>     it's very different whether you connect isolated rural dwellings,
>>     separated by miles, or villages, with clusters of a few hundred
>>     residences. (In the US, think Vermont small town vs. individual
>>     farms in Kansas or Oklahoma or homes along rural streets in West
>>     Virginia.)
>>
>>     One distinction is the average (or median) distance between
>>     network end points.
>>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     gaia mailing list
>     gaia@irtf.org <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
>     https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Arjuna Sathiaseelan
> Personal: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~as2330/ 
> <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/%7Eas2330/>
> N4D Lab: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~as2330/n4d 
> <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/%7Eas2330/n4d>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia

-- 
Melhores Cumprimentos/Best Regards/mit freundlichen Gruessen,
Rute Sofia
............................
COPELABS - Association for Research and Development in Cognition and People-centric Computing
Senior Researcher/Director
http://copelabs.ulusofona.pt

http://copelabs.ulusofona.pt/~rsofia
http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/rute-sofia
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rute_Sofia