Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: genart LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-netid-03.txt (and -04)

To be clear, I'm asking about the limits on the description and  
contact fields (text for people and email addresses) in this message,  
not the restriction on the netid length.

Do we have, in the creation of other registries, explicit restrictions  
on how long the "who do you contact about this" field can be?

I'm not objecting strongly to the limits on these fields, but I do  
find them odd, and they add work for IANA (who will have to check  
things against those limits), which seems in conflict with your  
comment about not doing any reviewing below?

RjS

On Dec 5, 2008, at 12:54 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:

> On 2008-12-5, at 1:12, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>> Regarding the latter question I looked at some registries, and these
>>> seemed to be acceptable limits. Regarding the former question, one
>>> has to have limits. What happens if someone submits a 1MB, 1GB, 1TB,
>>> etc.
>>> entry?
>>
>> IANA says "You've got to be kidding".
>>
>> This hasn't been a problem, and IANA's not going to need this  
>> document
>> as a shield
>> to protect against someone trying to do something like that in the
>> future.
>
> Is there any other registry that potentially names that are this  
> long? And with the first-com-first-served section of the registry,  
> IANA isn't supposed to do any reviewing.
>
> I think the limitation is reasonable and practical.
>
> Lars

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art