Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: genart LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-netid-03.txt (and -04)

-05 (and whatever gets decided on the registry non-technical field  
length limits) addresses all my comments.

RjS

On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:

> On 2008-12-10, at 10:15, mike@eisler.com wrote:
>> I fixed the references to obsolete standards.
>
> You fixed some, but not all. I'll leave the following (edited) RFC  
> Editor Note in place: "Please make the following replacements to the  
> document references: RFC2960 -> RFC4960, RFC1831 -> draft-ietf-nfsv4- 
> rfc1831bis"
>
>> As an FYI, I have been relying
>> on rfc-editor.org check if RFC numbers were obsolete or not. It did  
>> not
>> classify  several  RFCs as obsolete.
>
> The missing case was RFC793 obsoleting RFC675; the other ones were  
> there. I asked the RFC Editor to add that.
>
> Lars
>
> PS: Robert, we can continue the discussion of your gen-art review  
> while this document enters IESG  
> Evaluation._______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art