IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Re: GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-01

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 06 February 2006 13:17 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F66Eo-0003wg-Bm; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:17:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F66Ei-0003vp-T8 for gen-art@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:17:01 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA17297 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:15:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F66Ql-0000bK-0N for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:29:25 -0500
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B89B259728; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:15:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32620-04; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:15:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.160] (163.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.163]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D375259722; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:15:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:16:30 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <F5154A5C376D4E4F9F4037BE@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <78172685-CB09-4242-B936-67AE4017813B@cisco.com>
References: <31E5D26B8A12D889312D466C@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <FB85FC92-E66E-4277-9D7D-6FA5D95A677C@cisco.com> <2913423ED9ED9029779E82D7@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <78172685-CB09-4242-B936-67AE4017813B@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: raymond_zhang@infonet.com, kireeti@juniper.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk, gen-art@ietf.org, fenner@research.att.com, y.ikejiri@ntt.com, jpv@cisco.com
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org


--On mandag, februar 06, 2006 07:57:55 -0500 JP Vasseur 
<jvasseur@cisco.com> wrote:

>> Not terribly important!
>>
>
> Good, thanks. I'll repost today to move forward. Just a process- oriented
> question. What is the logical next step after having  addressed the
> gen-art review comments ?

What you should do - even before submitting - is to check with Alex as 
responsible AD.
This review was done in the Last Call period, and there may be more issues 
that were raised during Last Call that he'd want you to address.

If there aren't any, then just tell Alex you think it's ready...

                           Harald




_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email