IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Re: GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-01

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 03 November 2005 21:34 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXmjJ-0001Vm-E3; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:34:41 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXmjI-0001Vh-QF for gen-art@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:34:40 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA27940 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:34:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXmy9-00054v-PY for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:50:03 -0500
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786E12596D1; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 22:33:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21952-07; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 22:33:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220082596CB; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 22:33:38 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:27:25 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@OLDDOG.CO.UK>
Message-ID: <D758A7478688C10224EFE598@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <200511032000.jA3K0log015100@bright.research.att.com>
References: <31E5D26B8A12D889312D466C@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <007401c5e0b0$710a8d30$61849ed9@Puppy> <200511032000.jA3K0log015100@bright.research.att.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.3 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Cc: raymond_zhang@infonet.com, kireeti@juniper.net, gen-art@ietf.org, y.ikejiri@ntt.com, jpv@cisco.com
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1282903120=="
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org


--On 3. november 2005 12:00 -0800 Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> 
wrote:

>
>> Now, something I have never understood is at what point in the process we
>> should respin the draft. So we let is complete IESG review, or do we
>> respin as soon as possible to aid the review process?
>
> If the authors are willing and able, I always think a respin
> ASAP is best.  If a respin would take 6 months to wait for,
> then I think going ahead with further review is appropriate.

I've always liked respin at state transitions.... a respin the day last 
call expires may be a Good Thing.....

Adrian, are you holding the edit token on the document? In that case, if I 
get around to writing up the speling misteak I found, should I just send 
that to you?

                 Harald

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email