IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Re: GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-01

Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Thu, 03 November 2005 20:39 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXls9-0004nD-2x; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:39:45 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXlGb-0002NA-CP for gen-art@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:00:57 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA23294 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:00:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.20.225.112] (helo=mail-yellow.research.att.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXlVR-0002U3-Jp for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:16:18 -0500
Received: from bright.research.att.com (bright.research.att.com [135.207.20.189]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBAB8567; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:00:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by bright.research.att.com (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id jA3K0log015100; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:00:47 -0800
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Message-Id: <200511032000.jA3K0log015100@bright.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@OLDDOG.CO.UK>
References: <31E5D26B8A12D889312D466C@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <007401c5e0b0$710a8d30$61849ed9@Puppy>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:00:47 -0800
Versions: dmail (linux) 2.7/makemail 2.14
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:39:43 -0500
Cc: raymond_zhang@infonet.com, kireeti@juniper.net, gen-art@ietf.org, y.ikejiri@ntt.com, jpv@cisco.com
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

>Now, something I have never understood is at what point in the process we
>should respin the draft. So we let is complete IESG review, or do we
>respin as soon as possible to aid the review process?

If the authors are willing and able, I always think a respin
ASAP is best.  If a respin would take 6 months to wait for,
then I think going ahead with further review is appropriate.

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email