Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 07 January 2015 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF451A89A5 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 01:16:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PWdTZ2FE7I0 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 01:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3F71A8951 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 01:16:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C652CCCF; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:16:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NaCKxF30sJj2; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:16:49 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A762CC4D; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:16:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7B8A1097-8545-4993-8FA1-577514DFE8E8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C9283C7@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 11:16:47 +0200
Message-Id: <16BC55C6-861F-42BD-89A7-805A9F5CF531@piuha.net>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C9283C7@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/1hH1JW3XjxDPLCgiQjPtFtOn2t8
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:16:57 -0000

Thanks for your review, Dan. And I agree, and have placed a Yes position on the ballot for this document.

Jari

On 08 Dec 2014, at 21:10, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>  
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=AAICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=R08EeqLx_DlnxiFeFYaaohVRh4i-O7FUlf7SY_h1pNA&s=T3fAQj3qjlnAEhXKaSRyrfFwfpZxKxkN2faPO7d49Ko&e= >.
>  
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>  
> Document: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 12/8/2014
> IETF LC End Date: 12/10/2014
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>  
> Summary: Ready with nits
>  
> This is a clear and straightforward document, which requires the client and server TLS implementations to not use the RC4 cipher suites, and lists in an appendix the cipher suites defined for TLS use RC4
>  
>  
> Major issues:
>  
> None
>  
> Minor issues:
>  
> None
>  
> Nits/editorial comments:
>  
> There is one nit easy to fix – bracketed references of the RFCs updated by this document. are used in the Abstract. These need to be replaced by textual references to the RFCs.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art