[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EBD12949E; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:20:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.42.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148641603043.18879.10370223612053997606.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 13:20:30 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/6DIvk1TPSSB0FDxTjho1v1NrzFM>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis.all@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 21:20:30 -0000

Reviewer: Ralph Droms
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09
Reviewer: Ralph Droms
Review Date: 2017-02-06
IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-07
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09 is ready for publication; it
is a well-written document that I found readable and understandable
based on my basic (and, likely, quite out of date!) knowledge of ONS

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:  None