IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2B61A896D; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FS_REPLICA=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMb7rbb6y-il; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699A61A8971; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so48833525pad.1; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zfum6NOzMaYjKkN1YbJpApTacHXQZgEnGCQadMDhL+s=; b=Dzpnpfa+QKX9YCfUiBoWifUYJLaRImDe9x/rbFOydnvpN5y2DVq8Stofw7DBBtGC7T NEI3hRYbQmRsgC/w7ngk1mXqtppJitcdVocWuRy70N/yZw8x9cGf71OeEK1lVRM501w+ vl/Xk3yaBIISM82Fk6lTe+GpLs5nQU6FNxWMly6IVHlKCqnzkDuP3wtp9QzQ7D9ZGtxU myRr98OYGg6FgW777yTGQNwNaGJcBpvNqY/B2+Ob8BeGcA7FKsCTrQMdVUvez2rAdyL1 +1PEUrmdgTCsYcAMoVf4L3VgWbOBcdelZ3/PIcqpTtecGXQYUCDpQyd/35kWzdf7nEu9 C9YQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.114.196 with SMTP id ji4mr6816461pbb.46.1443640398984; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4e80:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4e80:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xa4sm2129490pac.28.2015.09.30.12.13.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <560B4DE6.80704@gmail.com> <D230CA64.D45D5%aretana@cisco.com> <BLUPR0501MB17152CE43B2E05F28D827EAFD44D0@BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <560C3451.4090500@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:13:21 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0501MB17152CE43B2E05F28D827EAFD44D0@BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/7gWCpz_lIfNn2SB6po4y_T0ARiE>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:13:21 -0000

OK, thanks. I think that those updates take care of most things for me.

I still think that this is not really an *update* to RFC 6514; it's
an alternative solution. But that's a minor issue, so when I am asked to
re-review this for the telechat I will rate it "Ready".

BTW I got a horrible bounce message from the Juniper mail system, as it
seems that Yakov's address fails.

Regards
   Brian

On 01/10/2015 06:56, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang wrote:
> I am the one to blame. Alvaro had all the reasons to believe I'd addressed his comments (I shared a diff), but then I had a second thought one issue and did not continue with the submission.
> 
> I have now submitted a new revision:
> 
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03
> 
> Thanks!
> Jeffrey
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aretana@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:10 AM
>> To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-
>> bidir-ingress-replication.all@ietf.org; General Area Review Team <gen-
>> art@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-
>> ingress-replication-02
>>
>> On 9/29/15, 9:50 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Brian:
>>
>>> The AD Review asks for a number of changes. To be frank, it's a bit
>>> annoying
>>> to be asked to do a review of a draft that will change during the Last
>>> Call.
>>
>> Yes, I apologize.  The authors had the revision ready on Sep/25, but it
>> wasn¹t submitted. :-(
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Alvaro.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email