Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-storm-mpa-peer-connect-07:(with DISCUSS)

[Elwyn Davies <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Russ.

I hope you have had a good Christmas break.

I responded to David Black's previous query about this on December 14
(see attached, copied to you at the time).  However...

I have just had a look at the -09 version provoked by David Harrington's
comments.  I think I may have been a little premature in signing off on
that version as the RTR frame discussion did still need improvement.
Verion -09 definitely fixes that issue IMO.  However, I think that the
note added to the end of Section 10 regarding the addition of further
'not-so-private' data perhaps needs another sentence about ordering, as
per my and David's comments.

Apart from that, I believe we are all done here - I have also reviewed
the IANA registries draft in the last couple of days.

Best wishes for the New Year.

Regards,
Elwyn

On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 13:17 -0500, Russ Housley wrote:
> Elwyn:
> 
> 
> Have your concerns been addressed.
> 
> 
> Russ
> 
> = = = = = = = = 
> 
> Discuss (2011-09-30) 
> 
> The Gen-ART Review by Elwyn Davies on 26-Sept-2011 raises some
>   concerns that deserve a response.  Please find the review at
>   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06754.html.
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "David Harrington" <[e-mail]>
> > 
> > Date: December 22, 2011 7:12:31 PM EST
> > 
> > To: "'Russ Housley'" <[e-mail]>
> > 
> > Subject: RE: Russ Housley's Discuss on
> > draft-ietf-storm-mpa-peer-connect-07:(with DISCUSS)
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Russ,
> >  
> > Can you check your DISCUSS on draft-ietf-storm-mpa-peer-connect?
> > I believe we have addressed all of Elwyn's concerns.
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06754.html.
> >  
> > Thanks, and have a Merry Christmas!
> > David Harrington
> > Director, IETF Transport Area
> > [e-mail] (preferred for ietf)
> > [e-mail]
> > [phone] (cell) 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

--- Begin Message ---

Hi.

Yes, I believe that all is well now (with version -08 and the new
registries draft).  I think Russ can remove his DISCUSS as the
registries issue has been fixed.

It is possible that I failed to respond to a previous mail reporting the
fixes.  Since it isn't on the telechat agenda yet, I haven't been kicked
to rereview it although I did look at the new version a while ago.

Apologies for any holdup.

Regards,
Elwyn

On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 09:13 -0500, [e-mail] wrote:
> Elwyn,
> 
>  
> 
> Could you please take a look at the -08 version of
> draft-ietf-storm-mpa-peer-connect and let me know how much of your
> Gen-ART review comments have been addressed to your satisfaction.  If
> you’ve done this already, and I missed it, I apologize.
> 
>  
> 
> This is a bit peculiar, as I think Russ is holding a Discuss primarily
> on the need for the registries (the draft that creates the necessary
> registries is currently in IETF Last Call), but my AD (Dave
> Harrington) just requested a new version of the mpa-peer-connect draft
> based on your review?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
>  
> 
> From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 11:48 PM
> To: Russ Housley
> Cc: The IESG; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Russ Housley's Discuss on
> draft-ietf-storm-mpa-peer-connect-07: (with DISCUSS)
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Russ and Elwyn,
> Thank you very much for very careful review.
> The updated document
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-storm-mpa-peer-connect-08.txt addresses the comments and minor issues.
> 
> The biggest changes are complete rewrite of IANA consideration section
> with reference to new IANA RDDP document and related cleanup in the
> document, and addition of
> of a paragraph to Interoperability section:
> 
> A note for a potential future enhancements for connection
>    establishment negotiation: It is possible to further extend
>    formatting of private data of the MPA Request and Reply frames and
> to
>    use other bits from "Res" field to indicate that private data
>    formatting.
> 
> Again, thank you very much for your comments and recommendations.
> Arkady
> 
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> 
> Russ Housley has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-storm-mpa-peer-connect-07: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> Please refer to
> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>  The Gen-ART Review by Elwyn Davies on 26-Sept-2011 raises some
>  concerns that deserve a response.  Please find the review at
>  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06754.html.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Arkady Kanevsky
> 
> 

--- End Message ---