IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 09 October 2015 01:34 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E512F1B2FD6; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FS_REPLICA=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CU-E7BtyxRh9; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DF51B2FD4; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so70358738pad.1; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dsODaesSLf4qF+lg8jp9VwZbZKhP6psiPqWwZ4uDn1k=; b=eoKbkqUbH+IDc3TtD/sk/xAlj/+8tPGV42qqqmweQmccWsdzLgJXok2DUn3k+nf1TV 9shNZNtmVlDP52xtKuwvPGCaTvFCkzSwsapqkEbuTnQ5p3Q0fjjnp03OSMGg1bEdEpvN I7wuwUBFU/ovXYnbI52EI9kCdiODoa7miRsF4qIAz0f2UVplDueKwNnUY11Oo2aGUd14 dd/c57YLbu8HuUilwNvmFD6CNT7PUdgfy49dKw4qIV7q/d23CMfVtfUhbKfjPLeEhdbn OaWtD0UL/75GgI0Db26AV/IaI1jzHEwCrVLYSu58Z0f1107RfVEUYZfGhbSBVPKKZIr8 jVgw==
X-Received: by 10.68.139.72 with SMTP id qw8mr11635265pbb.60.1444354497525; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.25] (123.229.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.229.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l16sm47915699pbq.22.2015.10.08.18.34.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <561719C5.4020602@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 14:35:01 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/DJcU7jBdhhwKDceZrT1iHHcqJFc>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 01:34:59 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-10-09
IETF LC End Date: 2015-10-08
IESG Telechat date: 2015-10-15

Summary: Ready
--------

Comments:
---------

Thanks for responding to my Last Call comments.

Minor Issues:
-------------

> These specifications update RFC 6514.

Is that actually true? Or is it just an *extension* of RFC 6514, which
doesn't merit a formal "Updates: 6514"? [In other words, will anything bad
happen if an implementation of RFC 6514 doesn't add this?]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email