Re: [Gen-art] [lamps] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18

["Brockhaus, Hendrik" <[e-mail]>]

Linda

Thank you for your review and comment.

There was a discussion at IETF 113 LAMPS meeting on CMP Updates style vs. RFC4210bis.
Please see the meeting minutes: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/minutes-113-lamps-01.pdf
As Russ points out in the shepherd writeup, the WG decided to go ahead with the CMP Updates document and provide a consolidated bis document in a later step.

Hendrik

> Von: Russ Housley <[e-mail]>
> 
> As stated in the shepherd writeup:
> 
>   When this update was started, the number of updates was expected to
>   be smaller.  It is recognized that complex update documents place a
>   burden on implementers.  So, when LAMPS WG tries to progress CMP to
>   Internet Standard, a bis document will be produced to combine the
>   base specification and the updates.
> 
> Russ
> 
> > On May 14, 2022, at 11:43 PM, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> > Review result: Ready
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
> > the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like
> > any other last call comments.
> >
> > For more information, please see the FAQ at
> >
> >
> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.ietf
> .org%2Ftrac%2Fgen%2Fwiki%2FGenArtfaq&amp;data=05%7C01%7Chendrik.bro
> ckhaus%40siemens.com%7Cc00481a3c9f54e3dff6008da36c89120%7C38ae3bcd
> 95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637882532734420467%7CUnknow
> n%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haW
> wiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=Z7a2Z5zBCzGLORxXqEn
> fTWfqBrcMkzse6mgafHKNLgY%3D&amp;reserved=0>.
> >
> > Document: draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18
> > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> > Review Date: 2022-05-14
> > IETF LC End Date: 2022-05-11
> > IESG Telechat date: 2022-06-02
> >
> > Summary:
> > This document describes the changes to the Certificate Management
> > protocol and explains why the changes are needed. The description is very
> clear.
> >
> > Major issues: None
> >
> > Minor issues: None
> >
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> > Will the updated CMP be published as a whole? instead of requiring
> > readers to refer to multiple RFCs?
> >
> > Thanks, Linda Dunbar
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spasm mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> >
> ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspasm&amp;data=05%7C01%7Chendrik.broc
> k
> >
> haus%40siemens.com%7Cc00481a3c9f54e3dff6008da36c89120%7C38ae3bcd9
> 5794f
> >
> d4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637882532734420467%7CUnknown%7CT
> WFpbGZsb3
> >
> d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3
> D%7
> >
> C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=VPD3Yv4dcvw6fC1pX%2FA%2BJanVvF9OfkDoZ
> hhMwodHn
> > Dw%3D&amp;reserved=0