[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016-10-13

"A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mahoney@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966261296AF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fswaTgMOfvnT for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D190D129685 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mutabilis-2.local ([47.186.56.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u9DLWjoZ094351 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:32:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mahoney@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.56.40] claimed to be mutabilis-2.local
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
From: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <69fcc020-96bf-63e5-d32b-ebb4dc222e59@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:32:44 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Eq9PsVYE21e3PEtTqTRVIe0OxXc>
Subject: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016-10-13
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 21:32:48 -0000

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

Reviewer          LC end      Draft
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Joel Halpern      2016-11-04  draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

Jouni Korhonen    2016-10-24
                       draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

Lucy Yong         2016-10-24  draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

Matt Miller       2016-10-25  draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09

Meral Shirazipour 2016-10-25  draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-10

Orit Levin        2016-10-25  draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-algo-06


The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

I will make the assignments in the review tool when it has been fully 
restored.

The template is included below.

Thanks,

Jean

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: