Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of IETF LC draft-ietf-enum-xmpp-01.txt
Miguel Garcia <Miguel.Garcia@nsn.com> Wed, 02 May 2007 11:13 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjClg-00015D-P1; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:13:08 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HjClg-00012u-4R for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:13:08 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjCle-000112-Am for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:13:06 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjClc-0000Kd-9M for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:13:05 -0400
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext13.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l42BCxU0024544; Wed, 2 May 2007 14:13:00 +0300
Received: from esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.34]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 2 May 2007 14:12:59 +0300
Received: from esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.177]) by esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 2 May 2007 14:12:58 +0300
Received: from [10.162.19.132] ([10.162.19.132]) by esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 2 May 2007 14:12:57 +0300
Message-ID: <46387237.2070106@nsn.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:12:55 +0300
From: Miguel Garcia <Miguel.Garcia@nsn.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of IETF LC draft-ietf-enum-xmpp-01.txt
References: <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D4665064BD6C4@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at>
In-Reply-To: <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D4665064BD6C4@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2007 11:12:58.0733 (UTC) FILETIME=[D74571D0:01C78CAA]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Patrik Faltstrom <paf@cisco.com>, Richard Shockey <rich.shockey@neustar.biz>, "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Excellent. Thanks. Alexander Mayrhofer wrote: > Miguel, > > Thanks for performing the review. Please find my comments inline. > >> Comments: >> >> 1) The document should be a bit more clear on which registry >> IANA has to >> operate on. In particular, Section 8 does not mention the >> "Enumservice >> Registrations" registry (which is the proper name). >> Suggestion: modify >> the first paragraph in Section 8 to read: >> >> This memo requests IANA to add a new "XMPP" Enumervice to the >> Enumservice Registrations registry, according to the >> definitions in this >> document and RFC 3761 [1]. > > I have changed the first paragraph as you suggested, it now reads: > > This memo requests IANA to add a new "XMPP" Enumservice to the > 'Enumservice Registrations' registry, according to the definitions in > this document and RFC 3761 [1]. > >> 2) I find a bit weird that references 2 (E.164) and 7 (XMPP) are >> normative. I think a reader don't need to understand E.164 or XMPP to >> implement this specification. As long as the reader >> understand ENUM, and >> the XMPP URI/IRI, it is sufficient from an implementation >> point of view. >> So in my opinion these references are informative. > > Agreed, moved to informative. The new "References" section now looks > like: > > 10. References > > 10.1. Normative References > > [1] Faltstrom, P. and M. Mealling, "The E.164 to Uniform Resource > Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) > Application (ENUM)", RFC 3761, April 2004. > > [2] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement > Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. > > [3] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform > Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, > January 2005. > > [4] Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource > Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, January 2005. > [5] Saint-Andre, P., "Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) > and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) for the Extensible > Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)", RFC 4622, August 2006. > > 10.2. Informative References > > [6] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - Implementation and > Specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987. > > [7] ITU-T, "The international public telecommunication numbering > plan", Recommendation E.164 (02/05), Feb 2005. > > [8] Yergeau, F., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Bray, T., and E. > Maler, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition)", > W3C REC REC-xml-20040204, February 2004. > > [9] Saint-Andre, P., Ed., "Extensible Messaging and Presence > Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 3920, October 2004. > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- Please note my new e-mail address: miguel.garcia at nsn.com Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586 Nokia Siemens Networks Helsinki, Finland _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of IETF LC draft-ietf-en… Miguel Garcia
- [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of IETF LC draft-iet… Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of IETF LC draft… Miguel Garcia