Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Thank you very much for your review, Dan. Authors, have you taken a look at Dan’s comments?

Jari

On 25 Nov 2016, at 14:16, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document:
> 
> draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
> 
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 11/25/16
> IETF LC End Date: 11/27/16
> IESG Telechat date: (if known) 12/2/16
> 
> Summary: Ready.
> 
> This is a very useful supporting document in the SIPREC cluster.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> None
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> None
> 
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 1. The title is slightly misleading, as the document does not have as goal to document all or the most important call flows, but rather to provide a grouping of significant examples. 'Examples of SUP Recording Call Flows' may have been a better title.
> 
> 2. As the document uses terminology defined in [RFC7865] and [RFC6341], listing these two RFCs as Normative References seems necessary (can't understand the terms without reading the two RFCs)
> 
> 3. typo in the Securoty Considerations section: '
> 
> Security considerations mentioned in [RFC7865] and [RFC7866] has to be followed ...
> 
> s/has to/have to/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Attachment: signature.asc