Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 15:19 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <24716A8D-07C4-4D5C-963E-D4631962AC37@cisco.com>
References: <CAFgnS4V70QpnS2p267kZyPDeVrBZ=D26fBAL8Cq3_OJWd-gw1w@mail.gmail.com> <24716A8D-07C4-4D5C-963E-D4631962AC37@cisco.com>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:19:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4UnmMZM2dfeRfdifbrO_4jPf0FTEAShSxp7W-Lxtw6ntg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1137b10644af8e05429a59a0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/NR5jEB_Yw5MOwt3GQAM_3BCe_VY>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-siprec-callflows.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-siprec-callflows.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
Precedence: list

Hi Ran,

Thanks for addressing all my concerns and congratulations to you and your
colleagues for the good work.

Regards,

Dan




On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) <rmohanr@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for your review. Please see inline
>
> From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, 25 November 2016 at 5:46 PM
> To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-siprec-callflows.
> all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-siprec-callflows.all@tools.ietf.org>
> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
> Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>, <dromasca@gmail.com>
> Resent-To: <rmohanr@cisco.com>, <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>, <
> pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, <andrew.hutton@unify.com>, <br@brianrosen.net>, <
> ben@nostrum.com>, <alissa@cooperw.in>, <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Andrew
> Hutton <andrew.hutton@unify.com>, <draft-ietf-siprec-callflows.
> all@ietf.org>
> Resent-Date: Friday, 25 November 2016 at 5:46 PM
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document:
>
> draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
>
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 11/25/16
> IETF LC End Date: 11/27/16
> IESG Telechat date: (if known) 12/2/16
>
> Summary: Ready.
>
> This is a very useful supporting document in the SIPREC cluster.
>
> Major issues:
>
> None
>
> Minor issues:
>
> None
>
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> 1. The title is slightly misleading, as the document does not have as goal
> to document all or the most important call flows, but rather to provide a
> grouping of significant examples. 'Examples of SUP Recording Call Flows'
> may have been a better title.
>
> <Ram> I agree. The document contains only most important call flows. So I
> will rename to “Examples of SIP Recording Call Flows”
>
> 2. As the document uses terminology defined in [RFC7865] and [RFC6341],
> listing these two RFCs as Normative References seems necessary (can't
> understand the terms without reading the two RFCs)
>
> <Ram> agree. Will do that.
>
> 3. typo in the Securoty Considerations section: '
>
> Security considerations mentioned in [RFC7865] and [RFC7866] has to be
> followed ...
>
> s/has to/have to/
>
> <Ram> Thanks will fix it.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
>
>
>

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-cal… Dan Romascanu
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec… Jari Arkko
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec… Dan Romascanu