Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 30 May 2007 20:52 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtV9L-00007A-3Q; Wed, 30 May 2007 16:52:07 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HtV9J-00006o-BJ for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 16:52:05 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtV9J-00006g-1Q for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 16:52:05 -0400
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com ([66.150.120.2]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtV9H-0002Vf-QP for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 16:52:05 -0400
Received: (qmail 24439 invoked by uid 0); 30 May 2007 20:51:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com) (12.104.13.39) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 30 May 2007 20:51:56 -0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:51:59 -0400
To: rcallon@juniper.net
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
In-Reply-To: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE07AFCBB0@ftrdmel1.rd.franc etelecom.fr>
References: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F24042EF1A3@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com> <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE07AFCBB0@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Message-Id: <E1HtV9J-00006o-BJ@megatron.ietf.org>
Cc: ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org, LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN <jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com>, gen-art@ietf.org, Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com, jpv@cisco.com, ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Ross: I think you have to issue a second Last Call to resolve this problem. Russ At 10:24 AM 5/30/2007, LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN wrote: > > 3) As noted in the proto write-up, there's a normative > > downref (RFC 3784). This downref was not called out in the > > IETF last call message, and it's not listed in the downref > >registry. > >OK, what shall we do to cover this point? _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-n… Pasi.Eronen
- [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-… LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN
- Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cc… Russ Housley
- Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cc… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cc… Ross Callon