[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05

<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com> Wed, 30 May 2007 09:50 UTC

Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtKp9-0002ry-Qs; Wed, 30 May 2007 05:50:35 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HtKp8-0002rs-KV for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 05:50:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtKp5-0002rk-3b for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 05:50:31 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.171] helo=mgw-ext12.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtKp3-0007rv-6p for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 05:50:31 -0400
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext12.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l4U9ntoQ015779; Wed, 30 May 2007 12:50:21 +0300
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 30 May 2007 12:50:19 +0300
Received: from esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.53]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 30 May 2007 12:50:19 +0300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:50:19 +0300
Message-ID: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F24042EF1A3@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
Thread-Index: Acein+7BuIHU+hxvT9iEZtZl28dSWA==
From: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org, ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com, jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2007 09:50:19.0779 (UTC) FILETIME=[EF121D30:01C7A29F]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Cc:
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call 
comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05 
Reviewer: Pasi Eronen
Review Date: 30 May 2007
IETF LC End Date: 06 June 2007
IESG Telechat date: (not known yet)

Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits
that should be fixed before publication.

Comments:

1) Section 8.2 "[IS-IS-CAP] defines a new code point registry for
sub-TLVs carried in the ISIS CAPABILITY TLV". The current version of
[IS-IS-CAP] does not seem to define any new IANA-maintained
registries. This may be an bug in [IS-IS-CAP]?

2) Section 8.3: the bit numbers in this section don't match the bit
numbers in Sections 4.1/4.2.

3) As noted in the proto write-up, there's a normative downref (RFC
3784). This downref was not called out in the IETF last call message,
and it's not listed in the downref registry.

Best regards,
Pasi


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art