[Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05

"LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN" <jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com> Wed, 30 May 2007 14:59 UTC

Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtPeJ-0006xJ-7G; Wed, 30 May 2007 10:59:43 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HtP66-0005Dv-QR for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 10:24:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtP66-0005Cp-4Z for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 10:24:22 -0400
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com ([195.101.245.15]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtP64-0006zp-M8 for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 10:24:22 -0400
Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.152]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 30 May 2007 16:24:10 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:24:06 +0200
Message-ID: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE07AFCBB0@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F24042EF1A3@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
Thread-Index: Acein+7BuIHU+hxvT9iEZtZl28dSWAAJGWyw
References: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F24042EF1A3@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
From: LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN <jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com>
To: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com, gen-art@ietf.org, ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2007 14:24:10.0953 (UTC) FILETIME=[30D04B90:01C7A2C6]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:59:42 -0400
Cc:
Subject: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Pasi,

Please see inline, 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com [mailto:Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com] 
> Envoyé : mercredi 30 mai 2007 11:50
> À : gen-art@ietf.org; ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org; 
> ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org; jpv@cisco.com; LE ROUX Jean-Louis 
> RD-CORE-LAN
> Objet : Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05 
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team 
> (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, 
> please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call 
> comments you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
> Reviewer: Pasi Eronen
> Review Date: 30 May 2007
> IETF LC End Date: 06 June 2007
> IESG Telechat date: (not known yet)
> 
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but 
> has nits that should be fixed before publication.
> 
> Comments:
> 
> 1) Section 8.2 "[IS-IS-CAP] defines a new code point registry 
> for sub-TLVs carried in the ISIS CAPABILITY TLV". The current 
> version of [IS-IS-CAP] does not seem to define any new 
> IANA-maintained registries. This may be an bug in [IS-IS-CAP]?

You are right this is a "bug" in [IS-IS-CAP] that has been fixed by IANA. IANA has actually defined a registry for sub-TLVs of the CAPABILITY TLV.
See sub-registry "Sub-TLVs for TLV 242" in http://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints

So we will remove the sentence "[IS-IS-CAP] defines a new code point registry for sub-TLVs carried in the ISIS CAPABILITY TLV"
and replace by "IANA has defined a registry for sub-TLVs of the IS-IS CAPABILITY TLV"



> 
> 2) Section 8.3: the bit numbers in this section don't match 
> the bit numbers in Sections 4.1/4.2.

OK, this will be fixed

> 
> 3) As noted in the proto write-up, there's a normative 
> downref (RFC 3784). This downref was not called out in the 
> IETF last call message, and it's not listed in the downref 
>registry.

OK, what shall we do to cover this point?

Best Regards,

JL

> 
> Best regards,
> Pasi
> 


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art